<p>Wow, huge increases across the board in terms of applicants, with Berkeley having 13% more freshman applicants, and Los Angeles having 12.2% more, and Irvine having 11.4% more. Transfer applicants dropped at all schools except Berkeley. Looks like there will be a lot of competition for freshman this year.</p>
<p>But remember, you can have the almost the same number of applicants but more applications</p>
<p>so if you have 1000 students applying, and in the past 1000 applied to 2 schools each, that is 2000 application, and this year those same students applied to 3 schools each, that is three thousand
applications, but the same number of initial students, so competition is rough, but the numbers don't tell the whole story</p>
<p>It looks like 6000plus more applicants in the pool of over 100,000, a 6% increase which doesn't seem that outragous (if I am reading form correctly and understanding terms)</p>
<p>There's another piece of data in another chart that says that says the average number of campuses applied to has stayed the same from 2004-2006, at 3.6 campuses per applicant.</p>
<p>which means more applicants are applying and not just the same number of applicants applying to more campuses. </p>
<p>the total applicants (people who applied to at least one campus) was 100,138 last year and this year is 106,784, which proves the increase in applicants and not just applications.</p>
<p>The GPAs can only be UC (10th/11th grades) are grades are self reported and you're only asked to report those grades (plus if you took math/language in middle school). Transcripts aren't sent until after notification of admission.</p>
<p>What I find interesting is the average stats for applicants vs. for who gets admitted. Lots of wishing and hoping on the part of many.</p>
<p>since there are a lot more applicants this year but the stats seemed lower, I think the average SATs and GPAs for this year's admits will stay the same as last year's (usually they go up every year).</p>