<p>I was checking out University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Chicago.</p>
<p>Theres not much information about UIC but it seems way less selective than Urbana Champaign. On college board, it doesn't give the GPA statistics or SAT statistics..it simply says:</p>
<pre><code>* 23% in top 10th of graduating class
* 58% in top quarter of graduating class
* 94% in top half of graduating class
</code></pre>
<p>ACT Composite: 21 - 26 99%</p>
<p>^^^Does that mean that they take ACT more seriously than SAT? (I have a combined SAT of 2130)??</p>
<p>I don't think I can get into Urbana Champaign but UIC seems way less selective.</p>
<p>So why are these two so different, if they are</p>
<p>I think with your SAT score you would be able to get into UIUC if that's where you really wanted to go. But yes, UIC is easier to get into but also has a ton of good programs (GPPA, for one) that are extremely competitive to gain admission to.</p>
<p>The difference is in the power of the degree and the preference of recruiters for UIUC grads rather than UIC grads. Basically, UIUC has a lot more top-ranked programs than UIC, and is a top-tier school, whereas UIC is a 3rd-tier school.</p>
<p>They are two entirely different schools. UIC attracts a lot of first-gen college students, who may not have been straight A students themselves. It's very Chicago-based. It does have good programs in the area of premed / sciences, assuming the student wants to stay in the Chicago area, but has little awareness or prestige outside of Chicago. Personally, I don't think it has much of a real campus feel, and I wouldn't come from outside the Chicago area to it -- if you want a true Chicago feel, I'd say DePaul or Loyola are better choices. (Of course, there's NU and U of Chicago, but they are at a whole different level academically.)</p>
<p>Which is not to say that someone couldn't get a fine education at UIC. But it's very different in culture, mission and selectivity than UIUC.</p>