<p>Okay, so this is the situation/dilema:</p>
<p>Cornell offered me guaranteed admission as a sophomore, which means that I have to go somewhere freshman year with a 3.3 GPA (nothing lower than a B). It's always been my intention to go to Cornell ILR, so I'm probably going to exercise this option (it's non-binding too). </p>
<p>Anyways, I was planning on going to either USC or UCSD freshman year, then transferring to Cornell. USC was my second choice, and Marshall sounds like a good fit. However, reading from another thread about the scary grading curve in Marshall has me REALLY worried (I have to meet the min. GPA requirement to transfer in). Then, I hear from school that the UCs aren't any better. </p>
<p>Basically, would it be easier to get a 3.3 at USC (Marshall) or at UCSD (Int. Relations)? Don't get me wrong; I like USC a lot. But I think that given this opportunity, and the fact that USC was my second choice, I should take advantage of this situation. And in case if I'm really happy at USC after one year, I won't mind staying. I'm just trying to make sure I make the right decision.</p>
<p>I don't want to sound bad in any way, but $$$$ is NOT a factor in decision. </p>
<p>BTW: I've also posted in UCSD thread in case some aren't too familiar with UCSD here.</p>