The university I plan on applying to recommends, but does not require, the submission of two SAT tests. The college’s website states, “Please note you will not be penalized for not submitting SAT Subject Tests if the cost of taking the tests causes financial hardship.” I’m poor, and could reasonably get out on taking the subject tests on financial grounds. However, I’m wondering how just how much weight is placed on the subject tests? How much would it hurt not to have them? Could it conceivably speak negatively on my education if, say, I perform poorly on both tests? Would it be better to have no subject tests than low scores on them? Thanks!
Yes
Yes.
College is missions is not like grading a math test. Few colleges will assign a percentage weight per category. My guess is that they are of less importance than SAT/ACT or GPA.
I don’t think good scores will tilt the needle much, although bad scores certainly won’t help.
The reason some schools went optional is that some applicants from lower SES backgrounds can’t afford more tests or the applicants attend a HS where no students apply to colleges where Subject Tests are requested, and therefore, may not have received the best advice from a GC. So, if it’s a financial hardship, don’t take the tests and assume the college is being honest in its statements. Good luck
Very useful reply, thanks!