<p>Decision still not made. Waiting for results of FA appeal at Willamette, though not very hopeful (they had originally said decisions would be released by 4/19, and they now say that due to the volume of requests, decisions will probably be available on the 23rd). Possible poor timing issue ahead, as I will be across the country from the 25th through the 30th, which seriously limits our opportunity to make last minute visits to the runners up. </p>
<p>We’ve ruled out a number of schools (St. Mary’s, UOP, and USF for inadequate FA, Sonoma State and CSUMB due to better options in major elsewhere, Southern Oregon due to better options cheaper and closer to home) and are down to four. </p>
<p>My son’s first choice is Willamette. His reasons are good. It’s strong in his major (Environmental Science), offers great learning support, has small classes and a great student:faculty ratio, the campus is a manageable size, and he liked the students he met on his overnight. The one downside is that the current price tag of $34,700 out of pocket after aid is more than we can pay.</p>
<p>The other schools in the running are:</p>
<p>UCSC. Pluses are a strong and popular program in the major, good student:faculty ratio for a UC, and well considered learning support programs. Minuses are campus size (son is not thrilled by the idea of taking a bus to class), large classes (especially Math), difficulty getting into required courses, and the fact that my son did not enjoy his campus tour there. His poor reaction was, however, probably a result of the type of tour it was. He strongly preferred all of the schools where he was not part of a large group for his tour. Additionally, quarter system will either be great (due to the ability to focus more on fewer classes) or a struggle (due to the rapid pace). Cost is $27,800. More than we can afford, but doable with $5,500 in Federal student loans.</p>
<p>UCM. Pluses are small size, lovely new facilities, really friendly and diverse student body. Minuses are large classes, location, low graduation rate, and less established academic program. Cost is just a few dollars less per years than UCSC.</p>
<p>Humboldt State. Pluses are reasonable campus size and very strong program in major. Minuses are worst student:faculty ratio of the four, remote location, poor graduation rate, and the usual concerns about cash strapped CSUs. Class size is better than the UCs, but nowhere near as good as Willamette. Also significantly less learning support than both Willamette and UCSC. They recommend hiring a tutor. The low price tag of $18,500 is, however, affordable for us.</p>
<p>One other minor consideration. My son does not smoke or drink (really). He’s not judgmental. He’s got plenty of friends who party. He’ll hang out with them, he just chooses not to indulge. Says he doesn’t like the taste of alcohol and that school is hard enough, “why should I make it harder?”</p>
<p>Other than the price, Willamette seems like the perfect fit. My son is eager to be done with the process (he likes to make his mind up and move on; soul searching and vacillation are not his style). I feel bad for making him wait. I feel bad for pushing him to consider UCSC despite his negative reaction to his visit. I worry a bit about the social fit at UCSC and Humboldt. Though Merced seemed like a better social fit, I’m concerned that its offerings (both in the major and in learning support) don’t measure up to those at UCSC, despite the similar price tags.</p>
<p>I would appreciate advice regarding the strength of the academic programs, quality and availability of learning support, and the social scenes on these campuses. Is it worth borrowing an additional $7k per year to send him to Willamette? We have no assets (don’t own a home) and we’ve got some consumer debt, so the idea of borrowing around $30k beyond the Federal student loans (which we plan to pay for him) is frightening, especially with the unjustifiably high interest rate charged for PLUS loans.</p>