What I Did Right, What I Did Wrong

<p>So I'm basically done with my applications, though I have no idea how it all turned out for me, of course. Partly for my own sake, as a kind of debriefing exercise, and partly for the benefit of anybody up-and-coming, I wanted to make a list of things I did right and things I did wrong as I applied (official past tense: hooray!). FYI: I applied in English, to 10 programs, all over the map in terms of selectivity. I made some good choices and also some major errors. Maybe if anybody else has anything to add, either in the category of thank-God-I-did-it-that-way or I-wish-to-hell-I-hadn't, they can reply and add. </p>

<p>Please note: I am not an Official Expert of any stripe...just passing on my small share of experience. Moreover, please note that several of these items are subject to disagreement: in a lot of cases, I included something on the Right list precisely because there was an argument to be made for more than one course of action and the decision was very hard: I eventually felt good about finding a way to sacrifice the good for the best. So feel free to disagree with me if you think I did the wrong thing. </p>

<p>What (I Think) I Did Right:</p>

<p>a) Very respectfully and tactfully asked major favors. For instance, I asked several people, including two very busy professors, to read (and in the case of one professor, reread), my 20-pp. writing sample. After I heard that a fourth letter could be helpful, I asked a couple of professors that I would never have ordinarily asked even though it was November already. One person I thought might write for me never even answered the email, but one person I never thought would answer turned out to be very responsive and happy to provide an extra letter. On balance, I feel like my application is much stronger because I asked for help even when it made me cringe a little.</p>

<p>b) Chose to submit Writing Sample A, in my secondary field, rather than Writing Sample B, in my primary field, because Sample A was publishable and showcased my foreign languages and specific research skills, while Sample B was not publishable. My secondary and primary field are more or less related, but this decision was still very painful. Nonetheless, I think that this hard decision positioned me much better for some of my top choice schools. Especially in fields where writing matters (English etc.), I think the writing sample should usually be a painstaking revision of a paper that was already substantially finished and almost never a new project.</p>

<p>c) Drafted my SOP and CV in October. I'm never this on top of my game: this decision was forced upon me because one of my LOR writers wanted to get the letter out of the way and asked me for the statement. Still, in general, I'm happiest about the writing that I drafted very early in the process--even if I merely took an hour in October to do the s**t version--and most frustrated with the writing that I started late, even if I spent the same amount of time on it on balance as I would have by starting early.</p>

<p>d) Sucked it up and spent money preparing and applying. I invested a lot of hard earned cash in this process, on test prep materials and on applying to ten schools. I stand by the decision to spend more or less freely: I try to be frugal in general, but I felt (and still feel) that in my case it would be penny wise and pound foolish to skimp on GRE books, multiple applications, etc.</p>

<p>e) Took practice GRE tests very early in order to figure out how much time I should plan to prepare.</p>

<p>f) Occasionally risked angering my boss at work (sorry, boss) in order to take care of my application process. I didn't do anything underhanded or unethical, but I did have to take a day off unexpectedly on more than one occasion to deal with the application process. Again, a hard choice, but I don't know where I'd be if I hadn't made it.</p>

<p>g) Thought hard about how my application would work as a whole, instead of focusing on individual pieces in isolation. Deliberately wrote my SOP in order to integrate my letters and coursework. Really tried to tell a story (as it were) in putting the whole thing together.</p>

<p>Things I Did Wrong:</p>

<p>a) Requested my transcripts in December. The registrars (I had several transcripts...long story) screwed absolutely everything up, and as a result I didn't have the information to calculate my GPA or provide my letter writers with full course lists or anything else. The reason I didn't get transcripts sent earlier was because I didn't have a finalized list of schools and I thought I needed everything sent at once. I should have requested all transcripts, first thing, to be sent to me and to the schools to which I knew I was applying, and then added as I went. So obvious in retrospect.</p>

<p>b) Failed to keep in better touch with my research supervisor after I graduated in May. I should have made it a point to stay in some kind of personal contact in order to keep the relationship live and keep up my engagement in my specialty.</p>

<p>c) Failed to get in touch with professors at most of the schools to which I was applying. Still trying to play catch up there.</p>

<p>d) Failed to read enough getting-into-grad-school books in, like, July. Seriously. I wish I had taken a day at my local megabookstore early in the summer and read everything I could find on this process. Instead, I was still learning about the process very late in the fall. I should have spent the money to get the books.</p>

<p>e) Committed to working an extremely consuming job this year. Oops. </p>

<p>I guess that if I could give some general advice on the basis of my own checkered experience, here's what I'd say. This list is basically what I wish someone had told me six months ago. A lot of it will no doubt be obvious to the more organized among you, but for me, it represents some hard-learned lessons:</p>

<p>a) Do a dry run of absolutely everything as early in the game as possible. Draft a list of schools and have your transcript(s) sent to them as soon as you possibly can. Take a <em>realistic</em> practice test of all exams you have to take: that means the PowerPrep software and the ETS version of the subject test. Make sure that you have <em>all</em> your own copies of important documents at the very beginning of the process. Draft a working SOP and CV and choose all necessary writing samples as soon as possible so that if anybody asks you to see a document at a moment's notice, you can immediately say, "Well, I can show you the current version."</p>

<p>Remember: this approach does not require you to spend any more time on the process than you would otherwise! Instead of trying to perfect your application one piece at a time, you just stumble blindly and rapidly through a draft of absolutely everything as soon as you can, as quickly as necessary, and then begin the long process of perfecting.</p>

<p>b) Always be respectful, but never ever be shy. I am often horribly, fatally shy myself. But my best decisions this fall involved forcing myself to get over my shyness, and my worst decisions involved succombing to shyness. Ask for favors. Get in touch with strange faculty. Extrovert! (No, "extrovert" it is not a verb; it is here offered as a furtive attempt at wordplay.) </p>

<p>c) Realize that applying well might mean that applying has to be your number one priority sometimes: you may have to place it above your day job if at all possible, for instance, even if it means that you have to create temporary tension. You have made the decision to become a career academic. That means your career is academia, not whatever-it-is-you-do-during-the-day. Or so I keep telling myself. Likewise, do not be penny wise and pound foolish: you are about to sacrifice at least six years of adult earning potential while a PhD candidate, which is an enormous opportunity cost, so you might as well make it worth your while and get in to the best program you possibly can. </p>

<p>d) Think about how your application will work together as a whole; remember that committee members are not trying to pass an ultimate judgment but rather trying to picture how you, as a person and a scholar, will function on a day-to-day basis on their campus. Use your own contributions, especially your writing, to integrate your application into a sensible, relatable whole.</p>

<p>e) Assume that almost all your available time will be spent polishing and beautifying, and do not imagine yourself taking on any major new projects, no matter how gloriously they might add to your record. As much as possible, rely on past, finished work at all stages of the game. Postpone any and all new endeavors (research or otherwise) until after January 1.</p>

<p>Well, those are my thoughts. Anybody else want to debrief?</p>

<p>Things I did wrong- </p>

<p>1) I asked the opinions of people trained as MDs about graduate programs. I ended up with two places that are great for their clinical connections but leave a lot to be desired in terms of basic research.</p>

<p>2) Stressed out about my undergraduate GPA instead of doing something useful with that time.</p>

<p>3) Applied to some places that I am just not excited to live in because I felt that they balanced out the schools i was applying to. (Thankfully I cut Philadelphia off the list before spending too much time and money on it).</p>

<p>Things I did wrong:
Started too early - I’m going insane waiting.</p>

<p>Things I did right:
Started early.</p>

<p>lotf629, your post is generous, smart and should be starred by CC. I have no idea how posts do get designated with a star, but this post deserves one.</p>

<p>Things I did right:

  • applied to the schools that I applied and knew the strength of each school
  • maintained ongoing contact with my supervisors (I continued my honors project in summer and got a part-time job in my PI’s lab last semester. I think this really helped me get a detailed reference letter from him. I also worked with my previous supervisor for 3 consecutive summers, so he knew me well enough to give me a strong letter.)
  • had a few publications which are proofs of my research experience</p>

<p>Things I regretted:

  • did not apply to Rockefeller
  • didn’t do the subject GRE (kept me out of applying to Scripps, unfortunately)
  • didn’t do so well on the general GRE (was hoping for 1400 or more)
  • got a C+ on my transcript (you can find As, Bs, and Cs on my transcript. Nobody’s academic life is complete without these grades.)</p>

<p>first, many thanks to loft629.
After your initiative, many people began to put up their thoughts on this post.</p>

<p>things i did wrong:

  • tried GRE Prep test too late, and found that i overdid the preparation for GRE general test</p>

<p>things i regretted:

  • didnt keep in contact with interested professors in prospective schools via emails.
    i wrote emails to at least one professor in each program and showed them my interest.
    most replies i got was to ask me to apply online through their official websites…</p>

<p>things i did well:

  • put in effort in my graduation thesis project even though i had to prepare for GRE and applied to a couple of schools. it seems that the hard work will pay off as my supervisor told me that we would be able to publish at least one paper in a reasonably good journal based on my results. Although this comes a bit late and may not be helpful to my application, i still feel very happy.</p>

<p>I just wanted to update this thread now that I have my results and have also learned from my friends’ experiences this year. (FWIW, I was accepted to seven schools and rejected by two.) A few additional thoughts:</p>

<p>a) Most important: when you’re thinking about advisor “fit,” or trying to pitch your application to specific faculty members, don’t rely on their list of publications: instead, research their recent presentations. Because it takes years for things to get into print, pubs may represent a person’s ideas from 2005 or 2006. Conference presentations, however, usually reflect a person’s current interests and the likely future direction of their work, which is what you care about when you are trying to sell yourself as an advisee.</p>

<p>It would benefit you, for this reason, to get a copy of the conference schedule for the major conference in your field and see what’s up. If you can actually get yourself to that major conference in the year you plan to apply, I would go out of my way to do it. It will give you a chance to hobnob, a concrete reason to email potential advisors (“I heard your Presentation X at Conference Y and was fascinated by…”), and a sense of where the field as a whole stands, which are invaluable as you apply.</p>

<p>b) I definitely overemphasized the GRE Subject test. Given that my initial score was high (730, 99th percentile), I shouldn’t have studied for it at all. It seems that while a bad Subject score can hurt you, an outstanding Subject score will do almost nothing for you. I had heard this but I ignored it because test-taking is one of my natural strengths. Don’t you do the same thing.</p>

<p>c) I wrote below, “Chose to submit Writing Sample A, in my secondary field, rather than Writing Sample B, in my primary field, because Sample A was publishable and showcased my foreign languages and specific research skills, while Sample B was not publishable. My secondary and primary field are more or less related, but this decision was still very painful.” This was almost certainly the right decision. However, it’s even clearer in retrospect that I was caught between a rock and a hard place, and that having a slightly off-topic sample may have hurt me. I should have forgotten all about the Subject test and spent that time revising the writing sample in my primary field.</p>

<p>d) You already know that fit is important. However, fit is even more important than you think.</p>

<p>e) I was right to emphasize integration, but I overemphasized it, at the expense of emphasizing fit, and that was a mistake. It would have been better to have some loose ends in the narrative of my own education and instead present a perfect argument for why my own future direction as a scholar was a strong match for the school.</p>

<p>loft629, this is a great post, and hopefully will be read by many upcoming applicants, and commented on by lots of users.</p>

<p>What I did wrong :</p>

<p>Re-took the GRE…and re-took it in December…I did so much better on the GRE the second time around, that i immediately updated the calibur of schools I wanted to apply to. This caused MUCH scrambling, stressing, and pushed or missed application deadlines. </p>

<p>–Since my school choices did expand and change in December and it was just absolutely down to the wire, I had to ask my LOR writers to submit more letters. This inevitably resulted in me “nagging” some of them by calling and leaving messages and begging them to submit their LORs. They were of course very busy and it was rude of me to ask them to do that, and I felt guilty but also desperate and compelled to push the process.</p>

<p>Things I did right :</p>

<p>–Applied to some schools outside of my reach. It felt good to get an offer from a school much better than I thought i could get in to. I’m glad I chanced it.</p>

<p>–Had about 5 great letter-writers (I was a double major, editor of the school newspaper, did a lot of research, etc., I got around hehe), so I was able to always have at least 3 of them able to come through out of the 5. </p>

<p>–Also worked on application/gre prep/school research stuff while at current job…which I also need really badly and would be in big trouble if I lost. But I had the same feeling as op–this is really important, it has to happen right now, and that’s all there is to it.</p>

<p>great post and thread !</p>

<p>I very much agree with early drafts of your SOP (this is important – you need as much time as possible to tailor it to flow smoothly and highlight your best accomplishments, particularly if you have word limits) and sucking it up money-wise. For any of you who are not beginning the process until this fall or later, if you are working in the in-between time, save up some money in a small ‘graduate school’ fund.</p>

<p>All told, it cost me nearly $500 to apply to schools and more money to visit the one I eventually attended, and I only visited one (and I was subsidized!) and applied to 5. If you are applying to very competitive programs where you need to apply to 10+ to do well, you may well spend $800 on the applications <em>alone</em>, not to mention the GRE ($140), any prep materials that you buy (books are around $30, prep classes can be $1000+)…budget well and save money for contingenices (like last-minute programs you find that you want to apply to or taking the GRE a second time). This is an investment in your future, and can very well determine whether you spend thousands of dollars on a good program or are fully-funded to that same program.</p>

<p>But don’t lose your job. You never know what will happen next :)</p>

<p>And I also stressed out unnecessarily about my undergraduate GPA. I wish I had applied to more Ph.D programs, and while I am very happy where I am, the only reason I applied here was because it was my “dream program” and I did it on a whim, more or less. I was very surprised to get in. I obsessed over my GPA to the point that I ignored the great qualities about the rest of my application - everything else was very strong, and I had a very high GRE score that balanced out my GPA.</p>

<p>As a sophomore. Thanks for your guys’ tips</p>

<p>Here is a thought for others to consider. I was accepted to my dream program but found that a different program was a better fit. Keep an open mind.</p>

<p>Wow, good thread, missed this the first go around. Looking back at my daughter’s process…</p>

<p>Have to agree on early start on SOP. she had to send the early deadline apps out with a less that stellar one (imo), it got really good after 15 rewrites. One or two of those early schools would have been a dream school. And when applying to many schools, you need to tailor each one a bit and deal with some word count restrictions, so give plenty of time. Also SOP was not polished enough for NSF grant.</p>

<p>I think she was smart not to spend precious time or cash on GRE study, since she is a well established good test taker. But, she should have taken a practice test or so in the MATH part, since that is her field, whereas she scored much higher in verbal and writing, percentile wise, though not raw score wise.</p>

<p>fit, fit, fit. could have spend a bit more time on this and maybe save a bit on applicaiton fees. the ones that it clicked at were obvious in the end.</p>

<p>Sorry, but what is fit?</p>

<p>“Fit” means finding the right program for your interests – and preparing your application to show why you belong.</p>

<p>Things I did right:</p>

<p>–Talked to students in the program. By doing this, I was able to get a much better picture where the best “fit” was for myself.</p>

<p>–Went to a big conference to meet students/faculty in person</p>

<p>–Worked like a dog on my SOPs; the school that I have chosen to attend said it was a major factor in my acceptance.</p>

<p>–Did very well planning: Started research on schools in the spring, communicated over the summer, made all LOR and app deadlines</p>

<p>Things I did not do right:</p>

<p>–Underestimated the importance of the GRE in my field with the more prestigious schools (Ivys, U of Chicago, Berkeley)</p>

<p>–Too many “reach” schools</p>

<p>I suppose I’ll add my own two cents on this, since people are starting to ramp up for the next admissions go-round…</p>

<p>What I feel I did/am doing right:</p>

<p>-Channeling the anxiety. Still five or six months minimum before I find anything out, so any time I feel the worry starting to well up, I find a constructive outlet for it: focusing on coursework to improve my GPA, reading articles from PI’s of labs I’d like to apply to, poring over potential new schools. Anything you can do to make crunch time easier.</p>

<p>-Researching fit at each of the schools I’m applying to. As a general rule, trying to find at least two (preferably three) PI’s whose research I’m interested in, and asking myself, “Why do I want to go to this school? Is there a good probability I’d be happy doing this/living here for 5-7 years?”</p>

<p>-Drafting my Statement of Purpose early and running it by the PIs who will be writing my LoR’s. Also goes under ‘channeling the anxiety’, but also helps with the human element of my application.</p>

<p>-Talking to my PI’s/other professors. I cannot stress how important this has been, both in terms of networking (“So you might want to check out Professor Y at Z school, he’s a colleague of mine.”) but also just in stuff you never would have thought to check for yourself. I’m half Puerto Rican, and a professor told me about SACNAS and the national conference this coming October. The same professor directed me to three schools I’d missed, one of which turned out to be a great fit for me.</p>

<p>-E-mailing professors of labs you’re going to be in, even if it’s just to see whether or not they’re taking on new grad students. Occasionally you get lucky: I e-mailed a professor expressing my interest in his lab and work. He wrote a warm response, detailed the current work being done in his lab, turned me on to two PI’s who were just beginning to branch out in my area of interest, and told me to look him up if I was invited to the interview weekend (and to call him if he was away on business).</p>

<p>Things I did wrong:</p>

<p>-Not taking this seriously enough until earlier this year, and not getting into the research game late.</p>

<p>-Starting a bit too early, since the anxiety’s bugging me.</p>

<p>I am 2 years out, but I will still respond.
Things I did right:

  1. Took time off after college
  2. applied broadly: all types of schools, in popular and less popular geographic areas
  3. applied to 10 top 15 programs: allowed me to pick between top schools
  4. Figure out tenative interview schedule from the beginning (make sure you save dates for schools you want to visit)
  5. Did not cancel interviews after I got tired of interviewing
  6. Research every school that you can think of when choosing your list of schools
  7. Chose to attend a school that excells in lots of different research areas, which allowed me to try doing a bunch of different things during lab rotations.
  8. talked to alumni of programs I applied to
  9. Did not take subject test
  10. Had rec letters from people at several institutions
  11. Spent a lot of time on PS and tailored it to each school</p>

<p>Things I did wrong:

  1. applied late/submitted app day it was due at places that reviewed month or more before
  2. As a lab tech, I picked a high risk project that did not work (pubs would have helped lots)
  3. Took GRE several years before I applied so the scores were too old for at least one school.
  4. GPA dropped some senior year
  5. My extra non-science major may have hurt me at some schools, but I am not sure.</p>

<p>Things I would have done differently:

  1. not use a non-science rec letter (one of my science rec writters disappeared for a semester)
  2. Contact faculty at schools I was interested in (I did fine not doing this but I will always wonder whether I would have gotten in school x if I had done this)
  3. Prejudge schools before I visit/apply: I fell in love with a school that I almost did not apply to and I hated the school I really wanted to go to pre-interview.</p>

<p>Things I did right:</p>

<p>1) Got some research time in, however little. As I was not thinking about grad school until the end of my junior year, all I got was an REU. Still helped, both in my own understanding and in my acceptance.</p>

<p>2) Got some teaching time in as an undergrad. It was a limited opportunity at my school, but it eventually got me a TA offer - even if I turned out not to need it.</p>

<p>3) Maintained good relationships with letter writers. With 3 years between undergrad and PhD it really helped to have talked to my writers a few times a year.</p>

<p>4) Had someone else read my SOP. My first draft was all wrong - well written, but not a good SOP. A couple of my professors looked at it and gave comments, the second draft was much better.</p>

<p>5) Walked away from a weak deal. I was accepted to two PhD programs immediately after my undergrad, and turned them down because I was dissatisfied with the first school and had uncertain funding at the second - they gauranteed me an RA, but did not set the rate until August! After a three year break I now have a better school with better funding, and the masters I earned in the interim is fully-counted against my PhD requirements.</p>

<p>6) Got a job. When I turned down the PhD programs I got a job with research opportunities and tuition reimbursement. Leveraging those put me in a very strong position 3 years later.</p>

<p>7) Visited all the schools to which I was accepted. The first round that meant paying out of pocket - I was waitlisted at one school, so I flew down on my own dime and talked to the faculty. Left with acceptance and 3 different funding options. The second round I discovered that one very good school had no appeal for me - bad thing to find out after enrollment.</p>

<p>Things I did wrong:</p>

<p>1) Bad undergrad grades. I did two stints at undergrad, and the first (in which I failed out of school) still haunts me even though my second time (6 years later) around was exceptional. This definitely kept me out of contention at some schools and required special appeals at others.</p>

<p>2) Mediocre masters grades. My masters was part-time while working, so it had to come second. I finished with a 3.60 gpa, lower than my undergrad and certainly not exceptional. One school cited this as keeping me out of a fellowship for which I otherwise would have qualified.</p>

<p>3) Kids, kids, kids. Because of my delay (see pt 1) I will be arriving at grad school with a wife and two children. This has been and will continue to be difficult.</p>

<p>4) Not saving enough money. Applications are expensive, moving (especially with a family) is expensive… I should have budgeted more for the whole process.</p>

<p>5) Should have solicited more informed personal advice. There are schools to which I probably should not have applied, and I am sure some of my letter writers knew it. I am also sure I should have approached some schools differently, and again I am pretty sure they knew it. While I am happy with the outcome, a more focused effort may have yielded even better results.</p>

<p>6) Got TOO involved with prospective faculty pre-application. I spoke to a couple of professors at a “reach” school who seemed very interested in me… but I did not get in - I do not even know if I cleared the first round, or if I was just outmatched at the end. Very competitive school, have no reason to be disappointed, but their support got my hopes up which in turn made my genuinely great acceptances seem inadequate.</p>

<p>7) Underestimated my work commitment. I will be a part-time employee of my company during my PhD stay. I initially counted this as equivalent to an RA/TA position, but additional commute times will add up to several extra hours a week and up to $200 a month in gas. My choice would have remained the same, but again I could have made better preparations.</p>

<p>Things I did right:

  1. Studied hard for my GRE, even though I’m a good test-taker. You can always do better.
  2. Worked really really hard on my SOP and writing sample. I revised many many times, did extra research, had multiple people read through them for me.
  3. Got my third LOR from someone outside my department - it was one of those situations when it came down between a decent LOR from inside the department and a great one from someone in another department.<br>
  4. Took a year off between college and grad school - couldn’t have done this while I was in school.
  5. Picked a good list of schools. I did my research quite thoroughly and would have been happy at any of the places I applied.</p>

<p>Things I did wrong:

  1. Started pretty late - other than the GRE, which I took in August, I didn’t think about applying until late October, which led to some scrambling.
  2. Didn’t get in touch with the departments before applying. My field’s a little more accepting of this than others, but I still wish I had at least emailed the professors I was interested in working with.
  3. Didn’t practice interviewing ahead of time. When I was asked to interview, I had about an hour or two before they called me on the phone, which was not enough to prepare. I should have practiced interviews with friends ahead of time.</p>

<p>Things I did right:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>Didn’t make any decisions I wasn’t sure about (which underlies a lot of this list)</p></li>
<li><p>Took time “off” after undergrad to do research much more in line with my interests, even though I already had 4 years’ lab experience </p></li>
<li><p>Opened my mind to new possibilities for programs instead of being convinced about anything</p></li>
<li><p>Picked the brain of my PI, multiple times, over the span of many months, for things like programs, PIs, schools, directions to consider.</p></li>
<li><p>I talked out my SOP before beginning to actually write it. I had conversations with friends, family, and coworkers about why I wanted to go to each school, what I have learned from my experiences, why I love science, etc. Then when I wrote it, everything had already been said before and it came much more naturally. The act of physically talking it out gave me ideas I wouldn’t have had otherwise.</p></li>
<li><p>Went to conferences, gave research talks (makes it so much easier to talk about your work in interviews!)</p></li>
<li><p>Turned my technician position into a Masters, giving me a much better chance to take my own directions and gain a sense of independence (wouldn’t have been worth debt, but it was free)</p></li>
<li><p>When it was mid-October and I finally realized what it was I really wanted to do, I acted very quickly to get everything in place by the December 1 deadlines. Everything else took back-burner from that point until all apps were done (to the point where my final paper for one of my letter-writing professors was late…).</p></li>
<li><p>I kept up regular, even if brief, communications with my intended future PI, just to maintain mutual interest</p></li>
<li><p>Always asked current students “Why did you come here, and what made you pick it over your other school choices?” I got one gem of “I came here because I didn’t get in to (my top choice) because I didn’t realize you shouldn’t get drunk at the student party.”</p></li>
</ul>

<p>What I did wrong:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>I should have kept in better touch with a few of my letter-writers. I ended up with a very last-minute request to a professor, who though I’m sure wrote a wonderful letter, was not too pleased with the time frame.</p></li>
<li><p>I waited until I had graduated to really think about my post-graduation plans. I was scrambling to find something to do with myself. It worked out wonderfully, but it was nearly pure luck that I got the job I did.</p></li>
<li><p>Didn’t study for the GRE. At all. I took it for admission to my MS program as a formality and didn’t bother to do it again. It didn’t keep me out, but it did me no favors, and I was even called out on it in an interview.</p></li>
<li><p>I put all my eggs in one basket. There was really only one person I want to work with, and once I found him and his program, absolutely nothing else could compare. Though I felt confident in my ability to get admitted, and he was definitely pulling for me, it was a nerve-wracking nightmare that something, somewhere would go wrong (not liking the PI in person, the program, the location, not getting in, etc).</p></li>
</ul>