<p>Reading vs. Science, what do you guys think!?!??/</p>
<p>I think reading</p>
<p>Reading vs. Science, what do you guys think!?!??/</p>
<p>I think reading</p>
<p>I think reading too since the passages seem really long to read. For the science one, while practicing, I just skip the direction parts and look at the charts. Both take up a long time. I also think the math one is the quickest.</p>
<p>i think science is hardest. In my practice tests and the April ACT I always ran out of time. Although I was able to finish it with time to spare on the June ACT, I still think its the hardest to manage time on.</p>
<p>I personally think the reading section is the hardest to manage your time on. It requires more reading than the science section, and in my opinion it has more thought-provoking questions as well.</p>
<p>Science for me. I actually (quickly) read through everything and I find some of the questions to require more critical thinking than reading. On the June ACT I had just enough time to finish reading and didn’t get to the last passage of science.</p>
<p>Reading, you spend the majority on the passages and are required to remember all of it for the 2-3 minutes you usually have left per passage on the questions.
Science was pretty much just looking at graphs and going back to directions if you needed terms or something like that. It was incredibly easy for me and I had plenty of spare time.</p>
<p>Reading. 10char</p>
<p>I think neither , I finished with extra time on both reading and science. I ran out of time for English lol, it was probably because it my first time taking it so I was not familiar with the format etc.</p>
<p>Science, in my limited experience.</p>
<p>Science for me, even when I skip the passages. I’ve never had time issues with the reading section.</p>
<p>Science for me.</p>
<p>I think it depends on the person. For me, reading was always the hardest section, and I thought the science section was the easiest. Others are the exact opposite.</p>
<p>Personally, reading was harder.</p>
<p>For the science one, I already knew physics and chem, so when I had to rush, I would only refer to the text for graphs. I ended up with 2 minutes left.</p>
<p>Reading is harder to manage time for me, but I usually do better than in Science.</p>
<p>Science, for me. I’m a whiz at reading so that took no time at all, and I hadn’t learned half the stuff that was on the science portion.</p>
<p>Science for me. I had a horrible time. (28)</p>
<p>I really think its one of those left brain right brain sort of thing</p>
<p>If you’re logical and science is like a puzzle for you, speed aint an issue
If you’re a avid reader and you read for fun, reading speed isn’t a problem</p>
<p>But if you’re both then both aren’t an issue
That’s how I look at it simplistically</p>
<p>Science by far. It was the only section I ran out of time on, though ironically it was my highest score.</p>