<p>I think this might have been asked before, but I can't find the thread...</p>
<p>In 2002...
107-160 => 5
85-106 => 4
61-84 => 3</p>
<p>42-60 => 2
0-41 => failure at life :p</p>
<p>wow, 107.</p>
<p>How is raw score calculated? :)</p>
<p>MC is worth 45% and FR 55%. Take your MC score, multiply by .45, add FR score * .55. I think....<em>goes off to make sure it works</em></p>
<p>EDIT: er...so it doesn't work...unless FR is worth exactly 229.545 points. All I know is MC is worth 45% and FR 55% of your grade.</p>
<p>Bump...anyone :)?</p>
<p>oh, we did this in class - our ap chem final was the ap exam of some year lol, and we had to grade them ourselves. i don't have the sheet of the breakdown of the raw scores but it went something like...</p>
<p>MC raw score x .95something = A
FR #1 x 1.9566somethinglikethat = B
FR #2 or #3 x 1.9566somethinglikethat = C
FR #4 x 1.9566somethinglikethat = D
Question #5 x 1.5something? less then #1,2,3+4 weight = E
Question #6 x somedeimal less than ABCDweight = F
Question #7/8 x somedecimal same as #6 weieght = G</p>
<p>A + B + C + D + E + F + G = final raw score outta 160</p>
<p>so basically they weight all the questions. one point on the MC is worth less then one point on FR #1. one point on FR #8 is worth less then one point on FR #1... etc.</p>
<p>noteworthy = the equation writing section, question #4 is worth A LOT for SO LITTLE work. just getting all FIVE of these 100% right ensures a good score if you do decent on other parts. on my practice, i had a 33 RAW for MC (i know, sad) but i got 100% on the #4 and i did decent (8/9 on first question, 7/9 on second question, 15/15 for the eq, and 4/8 for the LAST THREE questions) and i still got a SOLID 5.</p>