<p>They need to get rid of Shorty Subs and bring back Taco Bell. If you want to go after the tomato incident, go after the tomato provider. I had to get a brown sack bag during the final weeks it was open when I bought lunch there though because this one protesting girl just gave the most evil stares from her protest table.</p>
<p>I agree - it was a stupid idea to kick them off in the first place. It was either first or second (not sure if panda had more or not) in number of customers each day. The only reason its contract wasn't renewed was that the people who wanted it off (even though they were vastly outnumbered) yelled louder than anyone else. People who wanted Taco Bell to stay on campus didn't think it would ever happen (i didn't) and so didn't speak up.</p>
<p>They could have made up signatures for all I know. Did you ever see anyone sign their petition?? I certainly didnt..</p>
<p>ugh another USAC-related mess (right?). no further comment.</p>
<p>:rolleyes: Shorty Sub sure is bringing in the $ with their horrible tasting sandwiches priced ridiculously high</p>
<p>Does anyone find any of the Bombshelter food edible as well? Roadside grill is ok at times, but the rest IMO should not even be classified as food.</p>
<p>Just give me my ice cream tacos and chicken chalupas back :(</p>