<p>Your sarcasm is unprecedented</p>
<p>yea, I'm asking b05t0n what his hot guy would look like. so, b05t0n, why not contribute something relevant to this thread? no joking either to get around answering.</p>
<p>I'm a guy...A beyond straight one at that...</p>
<p>obviously the school that has the hottest guys is the one I attend...we're all studs</p>
<p>Bucknell!! i dont go there, but i do know that "Abercombie and Fitch model" is the common adjective used to describe them</p>
<p>Its not a serious thread; that obviously just flew over your head though.</p>
<p>This all depends on the girl, I'll lay it down for y'all. The problem here is that there are so many diff types of girls. These are stereotypes, I'm not saying they arent, but these generalizations are mostly true. There are always exceptions</p>
<p>Rich white girl- They are attracted to guys with money, guys that have an attitude. They like the sense of entitlement. The guys have to be decent looking though. Probably anglo like themselves. They will like Ivy guys, but they wont make the list because at Ivies its mostly smarter guys who dont care about looks as much.</p>
<p>Good schools for this type: most small, private schools. Loyola, Bucknell, Lehigh, Saint Joe's (just naming some around me)</p>
<p>Cheerleader type girls-they'll mostly go for athletic guys. Money is plus, but big muscles, and talent at sports are the hooks. State schools are perfect for this type of girl.</p>
<p>Rutgers, UMD, UCONN, URI, Delaware, Clemson, LSU, Texas Schools.....so forth.</p>
<p>Artsy girls- This type of girl doesnt care about money or sports, they actually DONT like either. They care about passion, passion is hot to them. A guy who has a different style, or is good at a fine art is a must.</p>
<p>NYU, Pace, Philly Art and those type of schools</p>
<p>Overachieving Girls-This is what I suspect most of the girls on this forum are like. They like guys who are just as competitive as they are. They like a liberal, smart and determined guy. Being sucessful at school and beyond is a big plus for them, but they dont care so much about money. </p>
<p>Ivy Leagues are good for this girl, the guys arent amazing looking, but their academic prowess will get them some love. </p>
<p>Thats all I can come up with for now, I could go on, but I'll get some input first.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, airforce16's attitude diminishes the humility the military tries to instill, especially the academies. Let them talk have the thread as attractiveness is a part of animals.</p>
<p>Also, us military academy people probably fit into all or some of those categories that cpenn described, which was a very interesting analysis of likes and dislikes. The guy in uniform who feels superior is probably one of the least attractive things to a woman, just throwing that out there... I think the guy in uniform is supposed to be liberal, competent, and smart by profession, particularly the military officer, not by some form of entitlement as Mr. airforce16 has displayed. Sorry to knock on you, but this is why some people think we're all arrogant.</p>
<p>I in no means tried to display any form of arrogance. I am tired of hearing people knock on the academies, "Oh so your not going to college?", I get that a lot...</p>
<p>Haha besides Mr. Boston began to crack up on my SWPA, which technically I am not originally from... Washington State...</p>
<p>I apologize for any inconvenience but I suppose this is why blogs are completely whack anymore, attractiveness as a part of the decision process? Maybe it just comes from thorough thinkers such as ourselves, but whatever happened to the value of education and its importance? To me, this thread is no better than saying best party school because that is all school is about right?</p>
<p>cpenn, I am a rich white (ex) cheerleader (I quit to take Combat). In the last year and a half I have (seriously) dated one White guy, one Black guy, and one Hispanic guy. Lol, it just happened like that. I hate the sense of entitlement rich WASPs carry around. It goes something like "I am just SO fabulous, how the hell could you NOT sleep with me?!".</p>
<p>Disgusting.</p>
<p>As for whether or not uniforms are hot... Sry, SJ I happen to find them pretty slammin but cmon af16. Air Force is for girls! When you grow up, go join the Marines like a big kid.</p>
<p>Both airforce and GoNavy, this thread is merely for amusement. GN, Ive seen Navy boys exhibit some rather animalistic behaviors (and yet, some of the most intelligent and honorable people I know are squids)....</p>
<p>I repeat, this thread is not to base a college desicion.
so At Ease, everyone</p>
<p>Rankings for Chicago. </p>
<p>(This is obviously not scientific... just my opinion based on guys I know who go to each school and on my own observations walking around campus... not that anyone cares).</p>
<p>Pure looks
1. DePaul
2. Northwestern
3. Loyola
4. University of Chicago
5. University of Illinois @ Chicago</p>
<p>Fitness
1. Northwestern
2. Loyola
3. DePaul
4. University of Chicago
5. University of Illinois @ Chicago</p>
<p>Confidence, charm, poise-- (different from "personality," which I don't believe in because it's consciously manufactured and fake, not to mention ethnocentric and egocentric)
1. Northwestern
2. University of Chicago
3. Loyola
4. DePaul
5. University of Illinois @ Chicago</p>
<p>Overall
1. Northwestern
2. Loyola
3. DePaul
4. University of Chicago
5. University of Illinois @ Chicago</p>
<p>haha ok so i suppose I may have overreacted, (ok i did).</p>
<p>again I apologize, and the AF is for girls?
now now lets not get another scramble goin here... haha</p>
<p>Ok, I recant my previous statement, af16, but some of my best girl friends are fly boys (...girls?). I seriously considered air force before I decided on the peace core... also, you did not seem to raise havoc in the "colleges with most attractive girls" thread was up...</p>
<p>SJ, non of the schools you posted are in CA : ( . I guess it does not matter.</p>
<p>U Chicago ranked #4? That's very sweet of you, sanjenferrer. People need to realize that there are lots of attractive people at Chicago!</p>
<p>No there arent...</p>
<p>No there arent.</p>
<p>
[quote]
B05T0N's right. People here need to chill. I find it funny how straight people are more offended by such things than gay people. It's all ignorance and misunderstandings. As long as you use 'homo' in the sense of just being an abbreviation for 'homosexual', it's fine. Once you cross the line into insults, that's where it gets offensive. That line was not crossed.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>For real. </p>
<p>I'm not saying calling something gay colloquially is entirely PC, but unless you're gay and offended on general principle, drop the Pollyanna attitude. You know they don't mean anything by it.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Well, keep in mind the ranking's only for the city of Chicago. But in fact, yes, there are plenty of attractive men at Chicago (a lot of them are grad students though, because grad students are more attractive on the whole). Schools with a lot of wealthy people tend to have a lot of sharp-looking people because the resources available to them give them an advantage.</p>
<p>tdanielle, why don't you rank schools in California? I'm curious.</p>