Which schools have the hottest guys?

<p>Oh yeah, huh...</p>

<p>Lets see:
(purely looks)</p>

<p>1.) Stanford (if youve got the money to go to stanford, youve got the money to look good... but again there is that damn sense of entitlement)
2.) UCLA (artsy, introspective mixed with the stereotypical rich/attractive ones. and cmon. its in LA.)
3.) Loyala Marymount (everyones pretty in LA)
4.) Whichever of the Pomona schools that is guys-only is supposed to be like gorgeous person-central. I have not been there, though.</p>

<p>Note: USC is not on the list because while the girls have the mini skirts and uggs down pat, the guys leave much desired.</p>

<p>So the girls are slutty and the guys are laid back? Sounds about right.</p>

<p>Thank you for giving us the blunt version.</p>

<p>Tdannielle- </p>

<p>Just like you quit cheerleading for combat, you dont fit the profile of your average wealthy ex-cheerleader.</p>

<p>Also, the girls I would date and the girls I would hookup with are TOTALLY different. That needs to be taken into consideration. These are guys you would bring back to your rents or just someone you would go with for a night? </p>

<p>Sanjen hit the nail on the head. The more wealthy the student body is, the better looking the people are. I actually think the sense of entitlement is really hot for a one time kinda thing. I wouldnt date that person though.</p>

<p>sanjenferrer, you TOTALLY left out all the art schools in Chicago (Columbia and the School of the Art Institute particularly)...I can assure the guys here are better looking than those at U.Ill-Chi at least.</p>

<p>And the probably beat all the other Chicago schools in confidence/charm if you're into artsy types at all.</p>

<p>Haha, I totally agree with:</p>

<p>""Also, the girls I would date and the girls I would hookup with are TOTALLY different""</p>

<p>The three guys mentioned above were all "brought back to the rents". My poor parents...</p>

<p>so, yes, they were long term.</p>

<p>Whoops, totally forgot about the artsy boys. I don't feel qualified to judge them though. However, I'll warn you that I have a love-hate relationship with hipsters.</p>

<p>Kindly, how would you rank the Chicago schools?</p>

<p>It's me...the rapper eater...feed me feed me feed me! No homo</p>

<p>Artsy guys are hott because they are passionate, but pretty much any guy with real passion is attractive.</p>

<p>I must admit... even the pretentious hipster types are attractive, until they start speaking. But there are also many hipsters that aren't pretentious.</p>

<p>i noticed how this thread went off topic.</p>

<p>I can't imagine there being a relation between physical attractiveness of the student body and different schools. </p>

<p>Did people think about the complicated variables involved, such as perspective of what attractiveness is? Some people do not find certain races to be attractive as their own. If you compare a school such as UC where half the students are asian, VS some school where most of the students are black, such as Hampton University; you may not get accurate results.</p>

<p>Texas A&M of course</p>

<ol>
<li>U. North Carolina Greensboro (UNCG)</li>
<li>U. of Arizona</li>
<li>Texas A & M</li>
<li>u. of Florida</li>
<li>UCLA</li>
</ol>

<p>I have an aunt who works at West Point, and... ohh dear. </p>

<p>Army guys are definitely the hottest. </p>

<p>They're TOTALLY in shape, they're required to be clean cut and presentable always, they're extremely well-educated, and they're polite. What more could you ask for?</p>

<p>
[quote]
What more could you ask for?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Their bank account number.</p>

<p>TUOWls2011: Hahaha! Hilarious! </p>

<p>On-topic: Seriously MIT? I imagined MIT to be the worst... [whoow. that sounds so bad.]
Anyhow, I'll be applying there next year, so that's always good news to hear!</p>

<p>i have friends who go to MIT and its pretty good actually :D</p>

<p>georgia tech</p>