<p>Forgive me if this is a recurring discussion - I can't find it anywhere else.</p>
<p>So I have fallen in love with Brown (among other schools). I am looking to study physical sciences and mathematics in college. Although Brown has a strong physical sciences department, it may not quite focus on these programs as much as schools such as Harvard and Princeton. </p>
<p>My question is, if I have the vague aspiration to be near the top of my field, should I look to make my college decisions based upon which schools have the strongest programs in my desired major, or should I "follow my heart" and go to a school that may not be as strong, but which I really like?</p>
<p>I understand this is completely a person-by-person sort of question, but I really wonder whether the concept that where you go to school for undergrad (especially in the physical sciences, in which I plan to pursue a PhD) is crucial compared to where you go to graduate school. Any feedback would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Do you really think that a graduate program in Physics at Harvard isn’t going to consider someone who was near the top of their class with stellar recommendations from a place like Brown? </p>
<p>Loyola University maybe, but Brown? Come on. </p>
<p>I don’t think there is ever a good reason to apply SCEA anywhere unless you are likely to get in, such as a legacy, a hook, or stratospheric stats. It’s too restrictive and doesn’t help your chances. Better to apply EA to some other schools like Chicago, MIT, Georgetown or BC which are more likely to help you eliminate schools from your list. </p>
<p>ED on the other hand helps your chances, so if your favorite is Brown, it’s good to be asking the questions that you’re asking.</p>