<p>Who are the students in massive debt?</p>
<p>Simple answer, IMO: those with clueless parents.</p>
<p>Those kids who have been raised with all the parent-enabled “must-haves” of the second decade of the 21st Century. iPad. Smartphone. Own car. Fancy vacations. Restaurant meals 5 nights a week. Boutique wardrobes. $2,000 prom dresses. Big unearned allowances. Etc.</p>
<p>And then they are ready for college, and guess what. Mommy and daddy come to the realization that in spite of the income that funded all of the above, they can’t write the check for the fancy live-away college that the kid has locked onto as their “dream school.” And they - child, understandably; parent, not so much - allow themselves to be seduced by the hype that where you go to college defines how successful your life may be, and that the ratings published by a defunct newsmagazine have any value beside generating page views and advertising revenue for the website of the rump of that magazine.</p>
<p>And so, rather than sit the kid down and explain that (1) mommy and daddy can’t afford it, and (2) the kid, if they are motivated, can get a high-value education in lots of ways other than the expensive alternative, and (3) it makes no sense to take on massive quantities of debt just to go to a “top-whatever” school - the parents enable and facilitate the assumption of massive debt.</p>
<p>Oh, yes, we’ve heard it: “They’ve worked soooooo hard to earn this.” To earn what? To spend what could be the best years of their lives buried under crushing amounts of debt?</p>
<p>But how about this. That what they have earned is a lesson in life’s realities: That you can’t always have everything you want. As kelsmom and mom2collegekids continually remind us, that there is no money tree. </p>
<p>They’re going to get that lesson, as certain as the sun rising in the east. The question – one that is totally within the power of the parents to answer – is when? Whether getting that lesson is deferred until the debt starts coming due or, instead, delivered in a painful conversation that takes place before the freshman deposit gets mailed – or even better, before the college search process starts.</p>
<p>This conversation:</p>
<p>“Honey, we love you deeply, beyond anything words can express. But the reality is that our family situation makes it impossible to send you to that dream school you’ve got your heart set on. This may not make sense to you now, but the way we can best show our love for you is to help you find a great school that we can afford to pay for.”</p>
<p>And the good news is that every student can go to college, get a good education, and graduate debt-free.</p>
<p>That doesn’t mean that every student can go to a sleep-away college, full time, and graduate debt-free.</p>
<p>Most students can live at home and go to a local state school (maybe with the first two years at a CC) and graduate debt-free. But even a student for whom geography (or a destitute family) make this impossible can work full time, go to a state school part-time, and graduate debt-free. I live in a poor, rural community. I know kids who have done this. And they go on to successful lives.</p>
<p>They may not graduate in four years (though I know at least one who did, and graduated not only with no debt but also with money in the bank, the child of very low income parents, and six months after graduation was in a high-income, high-prestige job in her <shudder> communications major). But in the arc of a complete life, what is the real difference between graduating at 22 and graduating at 26? It seems to me that the student who graduates at 26 without any debt is a whole lot better off than the one who graduates at 22 with a huge amount of debt.</shudder></p>
<p>To an 18-year-old under the constant barrage of the media-fueled, prestige-college-matters nonsense, it is understandable that they cannot make rational decisions about their futures. But there is no excuse why their parents cannot.</p>
<p>So I repeat:</p>
<p>Who are the students in massive debt?</p>
<p>Those with clueless parents.</p>