My son is film and writing obsessed, and has been from an early age. Making short films on his camcorder, writing screenplays, etc, etc. For years, his dream school was NYU Tisch; we made it very clear from the beginning of the application process to be very prepared to a) not get in, and b) not be offered enough aid (we are far from wealthy, and NYU’s stingy reputation is known to even a fairly unaware person like me).
Unfortunately, (b) happened . . . but to an even greater extent than I imagined. He’ll be going to a lovely, well regarded LAC (near NYC, too!) for literally 1/7 (!!!) of the price of NYU. He moped around a bit, as can be expected, but once he realized that NYU Tisch connections, while nice, aren’t 100% percent necessary for success and happiness in life, he brightened up.
The plot twist: I seem to be struggling more with this than him.
I mean, come on! What kind of a way is that to run a school? If NYU put a little less money into local and overseas expansion, and a little more into student financial aid (actual fin aid, not the loan sharks they refer all the non-rich kids to), think of the increased quality of students they could get. I bet there are a lot of artsy kids with Ivy stats that would go to NYU instead if offered similar financial aid as HYP.
Now, NYU seems to be the poster-child for this type of thing, but they’re by far not alone in the “could increase student body quality if they changed their priorities” category.
So - what do you all think? It seems to me there are some schools out there who seem to care more about profit margins than about actually being a good college. Which is their prerogative as private universities, of course, (no one is entitled to an NYU education) but I can’t help but think this is a bubble. Sooner rather than later the prospect of spending 70,000 on a film degree will have to be a bit less popular, no?