I’m frustrated that I still do not understand the difference between who vs whom clearly despite doing a lot of research on it. I know that who is for subject and whom is for the object.
My question is
is there a sentence like
blah blah blah, WHOM is a doctor? sounds very awkward and I can’t think of a situation that works.
I found the bill sale for my great-great-great grandmother Elisabeth, who is sold in 1850 in Cane River.
The sentence above always gets me! Because I thought that I was the subject, so Elisabeth is the object. Which is why I picked whom. Can someone explain this to me please?
It sometimes helps to think of sentences with relative clauses as if they were separate sentences. (I am correcting the verb tense.)
I found the bill sale for my great-great-great grandmother Elisabeth. She was sold in 1850 in Cane River.
In the second sentence, “she” is the subject. So “she” must be in the subjective/nominative case. “Her” would clearly be incorrect.
When you combine the sentences by replacing “she” with a relative pronoun, the pronoun must also be in the subjective/nominative case. So “who” is required. “Whom” would be incorrect for the same reason “her” would have been incorrect.
Ok thanks, that is what I needed. I wasn’t sure if there is a situation of WHOM is something. Now I know, it is so much easier for me. Thank you very much.
I have nothing else to add, but make sure that you really evaluate based on each clause. If you have a subordinate clause where the subject is either who/whom (or whoever/whomever), you need to make sure that you choose who.
For example: I want to hire whoever knows the area best.
Even though you’re hiring someone, the subordinate clause “____ knows the area best” overrides that. Even though that clause is the direct object of the verb “want,” you have a subordinate clause where whoever is the subject. If the subordinate clause acts as a DO/IO or even the object of a preposition, you may still use who if it’s the subject of that secondary clause/phrase.