<p>Recently, Ben mentioned something on the Caltech boards that made me think...</p>
<p>I have great scores on my SATs, good AP scores, great extra curriculars (hours of tutoring, science/math clubs, cultural/language clubs and honors societies), and I've worked concurrently (15 hrs/week ish) with school my entire high school career, after my father lost his job (poor guy has to put me and my twin through college at the same time). My brother's also been working, and we're hoping the combined income along with financial aid and my dad's new job this year will get us through. It wouldn't be such a problem if both my brother and I weren't going in at the same time.</p>
<p>The thing is, as a result of having worked, my grades have suffered. I'm by no means failing or near-failing (except for Art, which was the bane of my existence), but I'm a B+/A- student. I've taken the hardest class load available to me my junior/senior year (graduating with something like 13 AP credits), but my class rank is low due to my grades at my competitive school (public school, 1000 students in my class, last year we sent 5 students to MIT, in addition to a significant amount to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Stanford). I'm around the 20th percentile.</p>
<p>How would MIT look at this? When I mention it in my essays, I can't help but feel like I'm saying "plz pity me & accept kthxbye," but in reality I've gained so much from my work experience. I'd like to show MIT that, but at the same time, I feel like its only fair I should talk about the effects on my schooling due to the fact that it's taken up such a significant amount of time and effort.</p>
<p>On my application, should I mention that work interfered with school, or should I just list both and let the admissions officers assume such? Would it sound too much like an appeal to pity if I did mention it?</p>
<ul>
<li>Timur</li>
</ul>