Okay,now that I have got your attention,please read further.
Q. Should people be valued according to their capabilities rather than their achievements?
——————x—————
The presupposition that people should be valued according to their capabilities rather than their achievements is a categorical truth.Although some romantic critics would argue that achievements define a person,these critics are so dogmatic in their provincial ideology that they fail to notice the reality.Sometimes people go through such difficult conditions that opportunities for achievements become rare and the only way to measure a person’s value is by looking into their capabilities.This universal notion is exemplified throughout history and literature.
In the 1800s,Frederick Douglass,an abolitionist and social reformer,did a lot for the black people.He was initially a slave and nothing was expected from him.But he went on to become one of America’s most famous abolitionist.He gave speeches throughout the country,wrote a plethora of books,and debunked the belief that black men were incapable of acting as independent citizens.Douglass was certainly capable of doing many things and it would be wrong to value him according to his achievements since he went though insurmountable difficulties and opportunities for achievements were few.
Another illustration which demonstrates that capabilities are more important than achievements can be demonstrated by analysing the life of the current Indian prime minister,Narendra Modi.Modi was a tea seller in his younger years and didn’t undergo rigorous learning in universities.Nothing was expected from him and he was just a young man with big dreams who couldn’t afford to take part in national competitions pertaining to the subject of the country’s national interests.He had no achievements;he had a will…a will to change the dynamics of the Indian economy and make his nation great again.He joined the party ‘BJP’ ,impressed the leaders,and moved up ranks in his party.Today he is the prime minister of India and has made the country one of the world’s fastest growing economies.Had he been judged on his previous achievements and not on his capabilities,he would never have become the prime minister and would probably still be a tea seller.
Through a careful analysis of the life of Frederick Douglass and Narendra Modi,it can indeed be said that achievements are secondary to capabilities and that keeping this in mind is instrumental for maintaining the society’s happiness and tranquilty.
----------------------x----------------
Im new to the SAT essay.I’m no pro.Please help me out by giving me suggestions and grade my essay.Thanks a lot 
nvm i already got that graded
please grade this one
Assignment:Is envy necessarily a bad thing?
--------x------
The presupposition that envy is necessarily a bad thing is a categorical truth.Although some romantic critics would argue that we are progressing only because of envy,these critics are so dogmatic in their provincial ideology that they fail to notice the reality.Envy is the reason why hundreds of thousands of people get killed every year.This universal notion is exemplified in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and the British colonisation of India.
One illustration which demonstrates that envy can harm the society is exemplified in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar.In the play,Caesar,a powerful man in Rome is killed by a group of renegades which also includes his close friend,Brutus.Caesar,after winning glorious wars,come back to Rome and gets nominated to become the king by the Senate.This decision of the Senate makes many people to become jealous of Caesar.Brutus,who was a close friend of Caesar decides to get involved in a plot to assassinate Caesar;all because of envy.The group of traitors cajoled him to come out of his house by lying to him that the Senate thought that he was not fit to be the king.As soon as he stepped out from his house,he got stabbed and before dying said “et tu Brute”.After analysing the plot,it can be rightfully said that envy can cause even the best of friends to become the worst of enemies.
The British colonization of India between the 1778 and 1950 was because of envy.India was known to be the golden bird of the world;the country was famous for its spices,silk and handicraft.The famous French traveller Voile once said that India was richer than Egypt.Because of this,the British envied India.The British,with their superior weapons and soldiers forced the naive Indians into giving their land with promises that a better future lied ahead.However,at the same time,many Indian kings were furious and launched attacks on the British.There were myriad wars between the two and this resulted in the death of millions of people;all because of the British’s envy.
In summation,the notion that envy is not a bad thing is a fallacy which can be detrimental to the society.Envy is the root of all evils and has caused millions of innocent and worthy people to die.Mark Shelley once said “those who have become jealous of someone,should realise that they have entered a deep pit of darkness””.Envy is indeed a wrong thing and as such should be kept at bay if one wants to keep the society happy and tranquil.
Feel free to stop using gimmicky titles like that.
And learn how punctuation works; it almost always needs spaces after it. Like so.
Thanks.Since you’ve stopped by,could you please grade my essay thanks a lot