<p>Well, I’m more than a bit biased here, but here are my thoughts.</p>
<p>IMO, UPenn has the most “preprofessional” student body on your list. The most prestigious undegrad college is Wharton, which is business oriented. It also has a nursing school. IME, even the students in arts and sciences tend to be practical types who are more interested in post grad employment than going on to get PhDs. This isn’t an accident. Benjamin Franklin founded the school and he specifically wanted a school which would offer more practical learning than the curriculum at other American colleges. For an Ivy, Penn has strong sports teams. I love the campus, but it’s the most urban of your choices–I think the campus is even more urban than Yale. Greek life is strong at Penn. About a quarter of the student body belongs. Obviously, this is only a minority of students and you don’t have to belong, but IMO Greeks have a greater influence at Penn than they do at the other colleges on your list. For some people, that’s a plus; for others, it isn’t. See this thread for more info about sororities: <a href=“http://talk.qa.collegeconfidential.com/university-pennsylvania/448246-reps-of-different-sororities-at-penn.html”>http://talk.qa.collegeconfidential.com/university-pennsylvania/448246-reps-of-different-sororities-at-penn.html</a> Unfortunately, IMO, Greek membership at Penn tends to divide along racial/ethnic/religious lines. IMO, there’s less mixing of different kinds of kids at Penn than at some of the other schools on your list. Philly is, IMO a GREAT city to be a student in. It’s easy to get around without a car and there’s a suburban transit system which lets you get out of the city too. There are a gazillion other colleges in Philly and lots of stuff for college kids to do. Weather isn’t Stanford’s, but a bit better than the other schools on your list.</p>
<p>Stanford has the best weather. It’s the most suburban feeling of the schools on your list. It has the best sports scene. Many students–probably most–see this as a huge plus. However, one of my kid’s friends, who just isn’t that interested in sports, disliked it for that reason. it does have a weaker arts scene–less theatre and music. Because it is in a suburb there’s also less of an arts scene immediately off campus as well. I live in NYC and some of the kids from here have trouble adjusting to suburban life, and find it hard to find restaurants, etc. they can eat at on a student budget. IMO, the Stanford student body also tends to be pre-professional, though less so than Penn and the preprofessional vibe has a decided entrepreneurial cast to it. If you’ve never lived in a major city and you like suburbia, you may feel a LOT more comfortable on this campus than the others on your list.The Stanford campus is bigger and more spread out than the others; it helps a lot to have a bike to get around. A fair number of students have cars–I don’t mean most people do but certainly more students have cars than at the others. It is less like the other schools on your list than they are like each other. </p>
<p>Columbia UG has 3 components: Columbia College, SEAS and Barnard. I’ve not sure how the CC/SEAS division plays out for someone who is interested in biology and environmental science. They are in the College, but things like environmental engineering are going to be in SEAS. I don’t know if that will matter and if it will effect your chances of doing UG research. I’d check that out. As others have said, it has a strong core. Some people love this because it means a more shared experience. Kids I know who have attended outstanding high schools dislike it because they’ve already covered a lot of the core in high school–not enough to get out of it, but enough that they see it as too repetitive. NYC is the major attraction. It’s easy to get around without a car. However, though CC has discount tickets etc. NYC is an expensive city and some kids feel this means there’s kind of a divide between the haves and have nots in terms of social life. Columbia students have little interest in sports. Last fall, they were having raffles giving away prizes for kids who went to football games in an effort to boost attendance. There are a lot of preprofessional types at Columbia, but there are more intellectual types here IMO than at Penn and Stanford, IMO. </p>
<p>Yale. I like New Haven, but there’s no question that some kids who have grown up in suburbia are a bit freaked out by the homeless on Broadway, etc. Yale has really worked on improving its science programs in recent years, but I admit I think Stanford is still stronger. Among the sciences, though, bio is definitely the strong suit and the School of Forestry is a big plus for someone interested in environmental science.The sustainable farm may be of interest to you too. I think there is more mixing of different kinds of people at Yale than at the other colleges on your list, in part because of th e residential college system. Yale makes an intenional effort to have kids on fin aid room with kids not on fin aid first year. This causes some friction sometimes, but overall I think it’s a good thing. There are sororities and frats, but they aren’t especially strong. They don’t have on campus housing and even most members still live in their colleges. Theatre and music are strong and there are some good off campus options for them. I think that Yale has about the same mix of intellectual/preprofessional types as Columbia–so more “I wanna live in academia forever” types than Penn or Stanford. When Yale has a really strong sports team, like hockey last year, the students get behind the team, but there’s less interest in sports than at Stanford or Penn, but more than Columbia. </p>
<p>I’d suggest you think about what ECs, if any, you’d like to get involved in. Some ECs at these schools are highly competitive to join–and it’s not consistent across ECs. </p>
<p>I’m sure others will disagree with my characterizations of these colleges. This is just my personal opinion and I’m not an expert. </p>