<p>I'm planning to take the SAT Subject Tests in June 2010. I was originally going to take 2 tests -- Math Level 2 and Chemistry. I'm sure that I can score very well on both tests by then (possibly even 800s). I'm still unsure about how well I'd do on World History. My question is, should I take the World History test as well? I'm in AP World History this year, so should I take this test as well? Now that most colleges (incl Harvard, now) have made their requirements 2 SAT Subject Tests, should I just take Chemistry and Math 2 or should I take World History as well to broaden my horizons (besides just math and science)?</p>
<p>Next year, I'll be in AP Physics C, so should I also give the SAT II Physics test in November or October next year in case I apply for Engineering?</p>
<p>Taking a third is just another hour, and it’s not really much of a hassle. I’d take as many (awful as this sounds) as you think you will do well on. I’d recommend taking them now rather then having to go back in a panic and try and remember everything.</p>
<p>That’s sound advice. So, I’ll sign up for World History, Chemistry, and Math 2. I’ve looked on other threads, but there doesn’t seem to be much advice on a study book for the World History SAT. Princeton Review, Kaplan, Barron’s?</p>
<p>I need to get as high a score as possible, since most of the colleges that I want to go to require sending all of the testing history. I know I can get above 750 (even 800) on chem and math 2, but I have no clue what to expect from World History. Which books have accurate practice tests?</p>
<p>My son used both Barron’s and Kaplan’s for WH. He recommends Barrons, saying Kaplan was a waste of time in comparison. Just to give you a bit of background, he had taken a yearlong WH course his sophomore year and took the test at the end of his junior year. He had done lots of reading of historically based novels and played historically based computer games, both of which proved helpful. He got an 800.</p>