<p>It still could have been worded better though, IMO. </p>
<p>I just hate myself because I had 3/5 at first, then thought it was way too easy and that they were trying to trick us. Ugh…</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the dimensions for the triangle and parallelogram question? I remember it but I cannot for the life of me remember what answer I got.</p>
<p>If it was the grid in, I think the answer was 16?</p>
<p>Yes I know the answer is 16 but I can’t remember what I got</p>
<p>could they accept both 2/5 and 3/5 maybe? is that possible since it wasn’t worded well?</p>
<p>They will not except both. Probability isn’t affected by past events.</p>
<p>That radio question was WAY too ambiguous;</p>
<p>I interpreted it as taking both radios at the same time, so I thought that picking the first one didn’t affect the second one, thus I chose 2/3. </p>
<p>Now I know the SAT isn’t meant to trick people. Yay for overthinking.</p>
<p>I finally remember the 16 question there was an equilateral triangle of side 6 and a parallelogram on the bottom with height two. I can’t draw it out but it asked for the perimeter of the parallelogram and it was 2+6+6+2=16</p>
<p>what do you guys think i will get if i got 4 wrong and ommitted 1? any chance of 700+?</p>
<p>4 wrong, 1 omitted… so technically -6 (extra -1 due to negative marking)…</p>
<p>unlikely to get 700+… id say appx 660-680ish range. But you never know because theres a very likely chance that the curve on this test would be very generous so u might touch 700 or barely cross it </p>
<p>hope this helped =)</p>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Does anybody remember the problem that had the series? I believe the answer was 50/51.</p>
<p>If somebody could please reply with the question and or the solution, that’d be great!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>