<p>The question with options: fragril ailing
sullen…???
forceful direct. </p>
<p>Forceful direct was the answer since although she was week, she was not sick and she was certainly not sullen, she was quite happy actually (remember them laughing?)</p>
<p>I dont know why but i think i chose an option which is not among the three specified above but it signified the friendly and close relationship between the two</p>
<p>Any one remember the question to the answer of " it comes at too much cost" ?? i can’t remember it. please help me!</p>
<p>The grandma passage, i remember one question is for analogy. The sentences refer in the passage are same as blablabla(the answers are several examples). Anyone remember it?</p>
<p>Butterfly passage: her conclusion is based on observational data. I think the answer is “all the theories are well-founded” cuz the sentence referred pay attention on the correctness of the theory.</p>
<p>Butterfly passage2’s auther says that passage1’s experiment is implemented by crooked observation not well-founded so answer is her experiment is based on well observational</p>
<p>@bearbox: I’m so sure “anyone” implies the critic’s comprehensive view of skepticism: he suspects the data published by “anyone”. Very clear!</p>
<p>“fortuitous” means happening by chance, which in this context means that the butterflies’s routes are randomly determined by the wind’s direction.</p>
<p>I’m also sure that “confrontational” is correct: “confrontation” is synonymous with “clash”. “Oppressive” means something more serious than the merely fitful clashes…</p>
<p>I dun remember the question of “anyone” but if it is auther’s attitude about passage1, that is dissmisive, if not tell me exactly the question… i confuse that is 18th question or not.</p>
<p>i agree confrontational… i confuse confraternal…</p>
<p>i disagree fortuitous… that is not fortuitous cuz butterflies annually return to South Mexico though that is determined by Wind’s direction. And auther strongly contend that butterlies not intend to South so i think instinctive.</p>
<p>@Bearbox: this is how passage 2 attack passage 1,he said that the butterflies could be anywhere,maybe some were in South Mexico by chance, the world is large,maybe some other were in other place,who know?</p>
<p>@Springtransfer12
Do you know if “a person can change his/her identity” is the same opiton of
“the identity can be changed through different situations”???</p>
<p>can anyone tell me all the options of the " anyone" question?
they were sth like unorthodox nature of methods, he is very knowledgeable (on these lines…)</p>
<p>Yes i put
“the identity can be changed through different situations” too</p>
<p>@Bearbox: “instinctive” has to mean more than that. It’s like something automatically integrated in the butterflies, and the butterflies’s route are predestined by nature.</p>
<p>Whether the monarch has a map or not has yet to be shown, but what has been shown is that they’re capable of sun-compass orientation and time compensation,” he said.</p>
<p>“We don’t fully understand how monarchs migrate to Mexico, but there’s no question that they have the ability to use this sun compass and circadian clock. There’s no doubt.”</p>
<p>That is part about another passage2 auther’s that means the behavior is instinctive.
but I dun assure cuz some people who took november SAT in 2010 says that the question has trap… that ps2 disapprove the ps1 argument about butterflies’ migration as _<strong><em>… if it is real question… answer is deliberate but i hope we are talking about same question that auther2 suggests the butterflies’ behavior as _</em></strong>.</p>
<p>SO ABOUT THE “STABLE ENVIRONMENT vs CULTURAL VACUUM”</p>
<p>Did anybody put “mystical realm”? I remember soon after that it mentioned ‘mystical’ at least once while describing the mystical nature of the town…</p>