<p>^^ MosbyMarion:[size=-3]::HarryJones:[color=neonyellow]</p>
<p>^ Um, what?</p>
<p>a posting analogy</p>
<p>I’d take the 100 million, give a lot of it to family, live like charlie sheen for the rest of the time I got left, die on Drug OD before my timer runs up.</p>
<p>I would invest the $100 million. Then, during the last year of my life, I could live like Charlie Sheen, and I would be bi-winning.</p>
<p>I would probable go with option 1. If I were to live to about 80, that would mean 60 more years. Half that and won’t even become 40. Life’s too short as it is.</p>
<p>option 1 . no point in having so much money if your remaining life span is halved</p>
<p>Longer life seems to be winning…</p>
<p>
I’m bi-Winning!</p>
<p>
Lawl, it took me a minute to get this. It shouldn’t be HarryJones though.
[color=#ccff88]I think HarryJones didn’t use it. I could be wrong.</p>
<p>I still don’t get it myself.</p>
<p>Probably Option #1</p>