<p>I know these things are a huge nuisance, but I just thought I’d give it a shot… I’ve applied to Barnard regular decision and I really have no idea where I stand. So I suppose I’m just looking for some perspective, I’d appreciate any opinions…</p>
<p>So here goes nothing… </p>
<p>I have a 4.27 weighted GPA, I’m ranked 17 out of 550 something kids, that puts me in the top 3% of my class, if that means anything?</p>
<p>I’m an AP Scholar with distinction, scored pretty well on most of my AP tests. I’ve taken just about every AP class that exists at my school. I’ve also taken an extensive college curriculum at a local JC. I’ve racked up about 20 something credits there. </p>
<p>My SATs are lacking, I have a 690 CR 690 W, with a 12 on the essay and a 510 M (feel free to gasp). I took it multiple times and studied like crazy but I guess the SAT just wasn’t the test for me. Looking back I probably should have gone the ACT route but there isn’t much I can do about it now. </p>
<p>Would it be wrong to assume that my high AP scores would possibly compensate for my not so great SATs? </p>
<p>As far as extra-curriculars go, I’ve been involved in water polo for four years, I’m the opinions editor of my high school newspaper, I launched an independent literary magazine, I’m in MUN, I interned for a state assembly woman, I did a summer program for architecture and I spend quite a bit of time working on my art. </p>
<p>I feel that my essays were strong, and my recommendations should be pretty solid… Oh and my interview went well, or atleast that was the impression I was left with. </p>
<p>So, what do you guys think? Thanks for bearing with me.</p>