<p>Thank you all so much for all of the suggestions! I wish I could reply to all of your posts! </p>
<p>Mostly I am gathering that I shouldn't worry so much, at least maybe not yet! (I think Frazzled2 could have been my posting name.)</p>
<p>Looking ahead to junior year it just seems so...Busy with a capital B. I wish she could narrow things down a bit before then. How did your kids get from the hundreds of possibilities to a dozen or so? My daughter's school limits the number of applications to eight or ten, too. </p>
<p>JHS you are right about the athletics. It's a vague sort of wild card right now. We've always had an Academics First policy at home. I'm trying to keep the focus on the academics, but I know the athletics might help her get where she's going, though I wish she'd be wanted for her mind and the wonderful person she is. Well, I guess athlete is part of who she is too, who am I kidding. She loves the challenge of the athletics. </p>
<p>That's part of the "not scholarly" thing I was trying to get at. I guess I didn't put it too well. She likes her tough teachers and tough classes best, but she doesn't want to take summer courses like a lot of kids do. In the summer she works and does her sport, mostly. This will hurt her class rank, because the scholarly driven kids take summer classes to get into the AP classes sooner and take more of them. She will have a bunch of APs but less of them. She declined running for class office because she said she "couldn't do it justice" with all the practices she has, which is true. She doesn't care about National Honor Society either, she says they don't "do anything". I think she'll be one of the only kids not in it who is planning on going to college. So I guess all this will hurt her. </p>
<p>Thanks for the warning about the SAT scores. Maybe it's off topic but the info is really good to know anyway. I am embarrassed to say that 1200 old SAT is considered outstanding around here. Vocabulary--she is good at that. All the reading, I think.</p>
<p>Thank you for sending me to the similar thread and to the college board, and to the merit schools list. With her current criteria, the college board lists about seven hundred colleges. So thanks for all of the reassurances that she doesn't have to visit them all! Sounds like the board scores will narrow those down, although I just can't see her in a pressure-cooker sort of place anyway. </p>
<p>I honestly don't see her as scholarly because she is just is so unfretting if that is a word, not academically driven or pushing. She's very interest driven, if that makes sense. She's had a lot of "phases" growing up: ocean, space, rocks, dogs, biographies, those sorts of things. This is her sport phase I think. She's very artistic too, but in cooking, gift-making, school projects of any sort--nothing that would really help with colleges. I didn't know the reading made her scholarly. She's just as likely to read Opus as Dickens. Magazines. Newspaper. I would say she is an interesting and interested person. Not brilliant or anything.</p>
<p>How did your kids find colleges with the right amount of challenge? You have me really thinking about that now. </p>
<p>Do any of you worry about small schools seeming too small for your social kids after they've been there for awhile? Discussion classes sound good for her, but so do big vibrant campuses.</p>