<p>I am the parent of a senior, African American BS student and as such, I found the thoughts and comments in this thread particularly interesting.</p>
<p>MrsWeasley’s point in the second post rings true to our son’s experience. There are absolutely vast mixtures of kids that form relationships across all cultural and national lines at his school. These friendships are often the result of shared interests, personality traits and good old-fashioned chemistry.</p>
<p>However, I would guard against using the dining hall litmus test or any other public gatherings as an indication of the schools’ success or failure to promote and foster cross-cultural social interactions. Assuming there is no structured dining requirements that randomly determine student seating kids are going to associate with whomever they please. The congregation of all blacks at a table is no more indicative of the schools’ failure that to promote cross-cultural exchanges than that of all Chinese students at the next table.</p>
<p>The truth is, human beings tend to socialize in a way that is most comfortable to them. It is not unusual for individuals for whom shared cultured experiences exist to use those familial relationships as anchors in an ever-changing, often confusing world. Boarding schools are not bubbles but rather, they are microcosms of the world at large. If Korean students huddle to discuss the implication of the daughter of an assassinated dictator as a viable South Korean presidential candidate, perhaps this may be a conversation that these students feel most comfortable having amongst themselves. The same may hold true if a group of African American students offer their opinions on the outcome of the Travon Martin murder trial.</p>
<p>But keep in mind, these public gatherings do not necessarily provide a glimpse into an interpersonal relationship exchanges that may occur later that day on the south lawn or in the dorm; a conversation between two friends, one black, one white, as they bear their experiences about untimely/unfair romantic breakups or about overbearing parents who often fail to see or understand their children beyond the confines of their own myopic views or any other challenges they may face as human beings in general and adolescents in particular, regardless of racial, national or socioeconomic lines of demarcation. </p>
<p>And while we’re on the subject of socioeconomic distinctions, who cares if groups of students are viewed as “the scholarship ones”? Only in an a bizzaro-world, alternate universe can a young person who has been evaluated and vetted by an institution, received an enthusiastic thumbs up based upon their academic competency and character history, and has been financially rewarded for their endeavors in an effort to further promote their intellectual and personal growth, can being the recipient of scholarships be viewed as a awful thing. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, if students receiving financial aid are viewed negatively simply because of their FA vs FP status, it is clear to me that this analysis speaks volumes about the person doing the judging and absolutely nothing about the student. Remind your children that you can’t please all the people all the time.</p>
<p>Fundamentally, we can hope for an environment where our DC are afforded the dignity and respect deserving of all members of the BS community. At best, we can hope for opportunities for them to form strong, meaningful bonds across ALL lines. There is much value in the lesson learned that, in the final analysis, we all have more in common that the differences that divide us. However, encourage them to hold steadfast to their strong bonds with their dining buddies because the two friendship paradigms are not mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>Good luck with your searches everyone. Keep in mind our DC are not as fragile as we may think. Just trust your instincts and gut feelings of your kids during the school hunt and they’ll be fine.</p>