<p>@sherpa,</p>
<p>My posts herein were mostly tongue-in-cheek. It is difficult to take the original post seriously. I’m assuming this person is likely a junior in high school, or perhaps a sophomore. The first clue to me that perhaps I shouldn’t take the post all too seriously is that the poster appears to be looking for a way around the difficult path of academic achievement to obtain admission to a highly-selective college. The second clue is that the poster chooses a method which is even more unlikely than the regular route. Unless the poster has already patented some new technology, or has written the killer app of the 21st century already, this method is fantasy. What is proposed is unserious. Thus, my response is in a similar vein - not altogether serious.</p>
<p>As well, someone who thinks that a way to get into Harvard is to get rich by senior year of high school could very well be someone whose primary goal is to achieve wealth, for whom Harvard is more the means than the end. Thus, my question.</p>
<p>If the poster had said, “save the planet from global warming,” or “cure cancer,” or “write the great American novel,” my mind wouldn’t have traveled to the conclusion to which it came.</p>
<p>In any case, the course he sets out is not so easy as one might suppose. First, although many households do ultimately achieve net financial assets of a million dollars, it’s still a relatively-limited percentage of households - on the order of about 7%. </p>
<p>Second, speaking from experience, most folks accumulate even that modest level of wealth over a significant portion of their lifetime, of their working career. Many do it the old fashioned way - regular saving and investing. I know more than one person with a million dollars or more in ordinary retirement accounts who got that by saving a modest amount every year, investing in mutual funds, and not getting carried away with the emotions of the financial markets. Even still they are in the relatively-small minority of folks who achieve even such a modest level of wealth.</p>
<p>Third, there’s a difference between households with net financial assets of a million dollars or more and households of multimillionaires. When I look up “multimillionaire,” I get some version of “someone with many millions.” By “many,” I’d infer something more than two or three. Or even four. Or five. Less than 1% of households have net financial assets of as much as $5 million.</p>
<p>Getting to a million dollars over one’s lifetime is unusual. Becoming a multimllionaire by the time one is applying to college is an altogether different species of accomplishment. Two thousand folks will be admitted to Harvard this academic year. I doubt that two thousand high school seniors will become self-made multimillionaires.</p>
<p>It’s less likely that this poster will start a business and become a multimillionaire by the time it’s time for him to go to college than it is for him to get admitted to Harvard.</p>
<p>As for what motivates people, and what are their intentions, my own view is that most people have mixed motivations and intentions about most things. People who start down one path as a means to achieve another goal often get caught up in the immediate path, and never quite make it back to the original plan. Someone who starts a business to become a self-made multimillionaire in order to add it as an extracurricular activity for their college applications will either succeed or fail. If such an individual fails, it may not make much of an addition to the application, and thus may not overcome poor high school grades. If such an individual succeeds, he will be a very busy person; if he’s been all that successful, it’s quite likely that he will enjoy his work (enjoyment of one’s work and success at it are correlated), his success, and his career, and may find it difficult, or even nearly impossible, and possibly even undesirable to break away from what he’s created, and thus may become permanently side-tracked from the original goal, in this case, admission to a highly-selective university.</p>
<p>That being said, I assume that most folks who go to Harvard go for the education, the experience. I’ve had the pleasure of getting to know some of my sons’ friends at school, and most are not single-mindedly seeking great wealth. Yet, a significant minority of the graduates at Harvard wind up working in fields where the primary goal is business, and the business of making money, often in very large sums. I assume that, looking at the mix of concentrations at Harvard, many folks enter Harvard for that reason - to go out into the world of business and make tons of money. Thus, if they’d gotten to that goal without Harvard, perhaps Harvard may have been seen as optional. </p>
<p>I know others fall into it more or less by default, because other opportunities may not be quite as available. My older son, as a junior, is having to work through these sorts of issues, and the temptation to take the safe route - go make a lot of money in finance or consulting - is tempting, especially when more desirable options are fraught with uncertainty. As someone who has owned and run his own businesses for 30 years, I’m hardly critical of folks who go into business, even if the goal is primarily to make a lot of money. If one conducts one’s business affairs with honor and integrity, that is something the world needs.</p>