<p>I thought it was an amazing movie, with a good plot. Could’ve been better, but I definitely got sucked in and it was great (saw it in 2D). I highly recommend seeing it.</p>
<p>I’m going to see it right now :] </p>
<p>imax 3D.</p>
<p>AWESOME, though predictable. Some of my friends found the arm-linked, cross-legged dance a bit suggestive. </p>
<p>Who thinks the woman pilot is insanely amazing??</p>
<p>ugh. me wanna see avatar now!</p>
<p>Saw it last night. I actually really liked it. The 3D is awesome too.</p>
<p>Saw it a few weeks ago.Really nice move, looking forward to seeing something as good as this one !
BTW, who did you support?The humans or the na`vi ?It may sound strange but I actually wanted the humans to win !</p>
<p>lantx pretty much hit the nail on the head. i really enjoyed it</p>
<p>^ seriously?! That hulky guy? I’m 100% behind the na’vi</p>
<p>Fern Gully meets Lord of the Rings, only I couldn’t remember any of the characters names afterward. It sure was pretty but I was underwhelmed.</p>
<p>It was absolutely one of the best films of 2009, in my own opinion. :P</p>
<p>it was GREAT. The visual effects were great. I didn’t like how, at the early middle, when they first entered Pandora, the plot felt really contrived. However, other than that, it was fabulous. Great plot, and AMAZING special effects. I sided with the Na’vi :)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Your friends have warped minds… I thought that dance was weird but not…suggestive.</p>
<p>^ It was definitely suggestive if you’re talking about their “mating” scene.</p>
<p>Btw SPOILER</p>
<p>The sequel will have something to do with their son/daughter</p>
<p>^ I was talking about the huge ceremony scene around that big tree.</p>
<p>Oh ok, well I’ve heard some other people describe their mating scene as the “crosslegged armlink” so I guess that confused me.</p>
<p>Space Marines + Smurfs + Belated, crappy political commentary = Avatar. </p>
<p>If you spend over a decade and nearly $500 million on a movie, it better not be some generic hero tale that’s been told a million times over with flashy CG. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what Avatar is. Cameron did a better job with Titanic, and that’s saying something.</p>
<p>I don’t know about that,
He did a fine job with Avatar, a project that began in 1994 in an article I read.
He has revolutionized the film industry, in a way I suppose.</p>
<p>Really? How so? I can see how someone would think it was entertaining. Maybe even good, if you’re not a film aficionado. But revolutionary? I don’t see how, he didn’t exactly do anything new.</p>
<p>The effects were spectacular, I can think people can admit that (as every review has).</p>
<p>However the plot was cliched (think: Pocahontas), the script weak, and some characters underdeveloped. </p>
<p>Given the amazing visuals, the actual story disappointed.</p>
<p>I was entertained…but it’s not too good…unfortunately. (It wasn’t bad, though.)</p>
<p>For some reason, it’s become a thing to hate on Titanic…I mean, it has not been one of the better Best Pic winners…but some people love to hate it…</p>
<p>Well not in terms of scripted plot,
but as in graphics and 3-D usage.</p>
<p>Yeah you’re right I am not a Film Guru,
But I do go to Rottentomatoe often; does that count? :P</p>