<p>hmmm....I think the last response i gave to anyone on math between 7-12 was -inf. Yeah I wrote bloodly paragraphs and showed a ton of work for the exam.</p>
<p>I didn't do this; I don't know who did, but one of my friends found this on facebook and decided to share.</p>
<p>Have a laugh calc-ies.
Suddenly I begin to question the legality of the person who took this picture.
<a href="http://photos-f.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v253/190/51/1380360096/n1380360096_30071445_9063.jpg%5B/url%5D">http://photos-f.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v253/190/51/1380360096/n1380360096_30071445_9063.jpg</a></p>
<p>dang, i just wonder what kind of proctors they have where they can get away with stuff like that.</p>
<p>That was one of the problems I felt good on! I wish I could see the grader's face when he or she sees that.</p>
<p>LOL. I'm sure the graders have been desensitized to all the random pictures and quotes because I bet loads of kids do it.</p>
<p>I question the legitimacy of this pic because it is too dim to be in a classroom.</p>
<p>I would laugh so hard if someone did it Superbad style and drew a bunch of dick-characters.</p>
<p>Non-Calculator MC wasnt that bad, Calculator MC was easy, but free-response questions killed me. I could only answer one question completely. It was ridiculously hard.</p>
<p>if you're asked to explain your reasoning on the FR, you get a point or 2 for making an analysis line, even if you totally mess it up (like I did XD)</p>
<p>I agree, decent MCs and hard FRQs. Something I thought was interesting was that I was still struggling through some problems when no-calc MC was done, but I was done 15 minutes early on Calc MC (lots of checking, re-checking, and re-re-checking to stall time). I won't get into too much detail until tomorrow, but the absolute value really screwed me up on one of the FR problems.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Originally posted by Emi2008</p>
<p>if you're asked to explain your reasoning on the FR, you get a point or 2 for making an analysis line, even if you totally mess it up (like I did XD)
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I'm not sure where this information comes from, but it's not true, unless I'm completely misunderstanding.</p>
<p>There's usually only one point available for most explanations/justifications, and they usually are all or nothing and must be correct.</p>
<p>You can't post what you just posted. Edit it asap because you're breaking law.</p>
<p>who me? I'm breaking the law?</p>
<p>wait - its friday now right? Can't we openly talk about the test now or do we still have to wait?</p>
<p>The FRQ are out now, so... it should be okay.</p>
<p>Jeez, these threads are <em>very</em> active...</p>
<p>So (sorry if someone already answered this) but the graders <em>will</em> understand numerous abbriviations, right? Like vel for velocity and accel for acceleration?</p>
<p>I would think they would understand those two.</p>
<p>what did u guys get for the particle in motion questions?</p>
<p>4a t = 3 at x = -10 I think
4b 3
4c decreasing b/c vel < 0, but accel > 0
4d [0,1] and [4,6] b/c of rel. min/max</p>
<p>I'm pretty sure that's what I put, although more detailed and better explanations obviously.</p>
<p>so that would be a total of 9 points if you got the entire question correct then, right?</p>
<p>That is correct.</p>