<p>I was pleasantly surprised to find that I could answer all the frqs but I had to rush to finish #6 so I could have used a bit more time. The MC part seemed like a gift so I'm good for a 5. </p>
<p>I have a good teacher and we completed the book about 3 weeks ago and have been doing review since then.</p>
<p>
[Quote]
"Where is everyone else material wise in Calculus class right now? We're startiting power series right now but I had to self teach myself parametric equations, polar coordinates, and Taylor and McLaurin Series to be able to take the BC."</p>
<p>Hah. My school only offers AB, so I took that and started teaching myself BC material in March.
[/Quote]
</p>
<p>Yeah same here.</p>
<p>Wow are you guys serious? I thought the BC test was pretty hard, especially the FRQs.</p>
<p>The first 3 were pretty easy. I was getting worried because some of the answers seemed way too simple but hopefully they're right. The last 2 were hard for me.</p>
<p>The test almost had a double personality:</p>
<p>1 section easy, then 1 section hard. 1 section easy, then 1 section hard.</p>
<p>I must be weird. I thought the non-calculator MC was easier than the calculator one. Hahaha... interesting.</p>
<p>non calc mc: ok
calc mc: easy
calc fr: pretty good
non calc fr: ok</p>
<p>^</p>
<p>About right.</p>
<p>i had form q</p>
<p>non calc mc : HARD! i skipped 11 questions but mainly because of time. i felt confident about most of the ones i answered.
calc mc: easy! i didn't skip any
calc fr: soooo easy except the part with the depth of the lake..
non calc fr: at first i thought number 5 and 6 were really hard but they ended up alright. i definitely pulled a 9 or two.</p>
<p>so overall i'm somewhat confident about a 5.</p>
<p>does anyone else thing there it was weird that there was NO interval of convergence question?? i was so relieved.
and there wasn't any logistic growth on free response!</p>
<p>i absolutely dominated the mc cept for like one question which stumped me and for the free responce i finished with like 20 minutes left</p>
<p>non cal MC- skipped two
cal MC- no skip</p>
<p>cal FR 1- about 5/9
cal FR 2- 6/9
cal FR 3- 8/9</p>
<p>no cal FR 4- 9/9
no cal FR 5- 5/9
no cal FR 6- 4/9</p>
<p>being very pessimistic here...</p>
<p>anyone think that is a 5?</p>
<p>^^ thats easily a 5....</p>
<p>how many did you have wrong on the mc do you think? I fell into traps and I only skipped two both on the NON CaLC MC section. Now i'm looking at a bunch wrong hoping for a four though.</p>
<p>That is definently a 5. You will need, at worst, 70% to get a 5.</p>
<p>thanks....i was just wondering....but the MC were really easy in my opinion....the two i skipped were the only ones i didnt know how to do...but yeah....out of the 43 that i did....maybe missed 6 MAX....is that still a 5?</p>
<p>Join apcalcbc chat room on AIM.</p>
<p>Calc MC: Skipped 4, Guess 2
Non-Calc MC: Skipped 2, No guess
Calc FRQ: 7-8, 7-8, 0
Non-calc FRQ: 9, 9, 0</p>
<p>Would that pull out to be a five? I thought I would barely get a 4 going into the test, but perhaps I can be slightly optimistic about my chances for a 5?</p>
<p>^^ i think that could still get u a 4</p>
<p>MC was okay. Skipped 1 total.</p>
<p>BOMBED the FR. Totally didn't have time to finish all the questions well, and I don't even know if I got them right.</p>
<p>I asked my classmates and it was 50-50 with difficulty of FR... why are ppl here saying it was easy?</p>
<p>That test was a joke.. finished everything with 15+ minutes to spare on each section. Lots more questions with critical thinking than I expected, but they were extremely easy as well.</p>
<p>Hope everyone gets a 4 or 5 :)</p>
<p>0 studying helps :P</p>