<p>Hello all,
I'm a motivated student willing to put forth a great deal of effort toward studying for APs, but I'm also relatively pressed for time. This year I'm taking Lit., which I'm not worried about, and Euro and Calc BC, which I am worried about.<br>
My question is this: if I took an independent study AP Microecnomics class, and purchased a Princeton review book that I firmly intend on reading, should I attempt to take AP Macoreconomics? Or is it way too late to start trying to teach myself new material with a busy schedule? Anyone who's taken the test or ended up in my position can help, and it'd be greatly appreciated. Thanks!</p>
<p>Im sort of in ur situation too!</p>
<p>Im self studying for macro (as well as a couple of other easier ones), but I started 3 months ago.</p>
<p>If you decide to go for it, you probably could, but you are now sort of pressed for time. It's definately going to mean a few late nites!</p>
<p>Macro is actually sort of easy (easier than micro IMO), and PR is a good prep book, although it lacks practice questions (I have it) . I think Barrons has more.</p>
<p>BEST of LUck!</p>
<p>Hey Claudius, thanks a lot for the response. I'm still thinking about it, and the fact that you've been studying for three months is definitely a clue-in for me that I shouldn't try to do anything on short time. I guess I just have one more question--do you feel prepared (i.e., 4 or 5 level) just from reading those review books?
Thanks :)</p>
<p>I Probably wouldn't feel prepared for a 4 of 5, but that's why I bought a textbook for micro and macro. This helps fill in the gaps of the PR book, and provides some good practice questions.</p>
<p>With the texts, I think I should get a 4 or 5 (hopefully)</p>
<p>Thank you, you've helped me out a lot ^_^</p>