<p>two questions:</p>
<li>are the qs in barron’s harder than the actual exam?</li>
<li>are there a decent amount of qs that ask you which researcher out of the given studied say latent learning?</li>
</ol>
<p>I'm wondering the same thing myself. I took the first Barron's exam earlier today and got a 130, but it seemed way too easy. I don't know.</p>
<p>The review portion is excellent, though.</p>
<p>The MC wasn't dominated with researcher-specific questions, but there were some in there. One of the essays requires specific knowledge of the contributions of four different psychologists, though.</p>
<p>If you're wanting a decent review of the major psychologists and their contributions, there's a list of like 30 of them on one of the first pages. Edward Tolman isn't there, though, I don't think. He is the latent learning guy, right?</p>
<p>yes he was latent learning
he was a question in the barron's book though in review questions for that section
pg 97 which of the following researchers studied latent learning?</p>
<p>casual bump</p>
<p>meh..........</p>
<p>I think the questions are harder than the actual exam, because I have the released exam from 2004, and it seems much easier. Barron's tends to ask questions about very specific information, and the answers can sometimes be very similar, but it isn't like this in the released exam. The real free response, though, is much broader than the Barron's free response.</p>
<p>Barrons prepares you for MC by slamming you with difficult questions. In my experience, I have not seen a Barrons test easier than the actual exam.</p>
<p>does anyone have the answers for the 2004 mc test?</p>
<p>yeah just making sure</p>
<p>i have that one too but it is intensely easy so i thought it might be a fluke</p>
<p>i have the 2006 exam</p>