<p>NMD,
I wonder if you realize how frequently within this thread you have been contradicting yourself.</p>
<p>You say "Yes" to my question regarding your assumptions about <em>all</em> Ivy applicants, yet in the next breath, state that you wouldn't know about the motivations of those applicants, when the Ivy Mania description you provide in fact encompasses motivations.</p>
<p>You're quite free about your sweeping generalizations, yet reply to one poster who cites his son's motivations as a contrast, that generalizations are not useful. (I agree, they're not.)</p>
<p>You're fine with Absolutes when it comes to the world of Ivy applicants, yet admit that you work in a "hotbed" (relative to interest in the Ivies, etc.), suggesting disproportionate interest not applicable to all US regions, let alone foreign countries. Simply put, your work environment is not representative of the universe of those students seeking admission to one or 8 Ivies. Possibly you are in a position to assess accurately, or approximately, the overarching reasons for Ivy interest among your contacts in your environment. Period.</p>
<p>In my D's small senior class, there were 4 Ivy applicants. Three of them had a Short List (one or two) of particular Ivies for specific reasons, which did not relate to the "Ivy Mania" you describe. The fourth person seems to be esp. into "bragging rights" & "prestige," fueled somewhat by her parents, somewhat by herself. (Neither parent went to an Ivy, but seem particularly invested in them emotionally.) Does this mean that I can even generalize to saying that as many as one-quarter of all Ivy applicants are "Ivy Maniacs"? Maybe it's one quarter, maybe 3/4, maybe another figure. Neither your nor my environment has any value when it comes to generalizing, which you are doing.</p>
<p>There are thousands of Ivy applicants who do not live near, have parents working in, or have a legacy pertaining to, any Ivy. These same applicants may be applying for reasons not pertaining to "Mania." Certainly often they are applying (ironically) quite <em>against</em> their parents' wishes.</p>
<p>There are phonies in every environment. There are parents at my D's school who enrolled their children there for reasons of prestige, etc., rather than for the intellectual atmosphere it provides. Does that mean that my D should not have chosen that school -- which in fact provided her with the top-notch education she sought, & anticipated 4 yrs ago, without respect to "prestige"? She should not have even associated with a school that includes wealthy non-achievers among its student body?</p>
<p>You will find, btw, that many Ivy applicants with non-"Mania" motives also applied to U of Chicago, as well as some highly reputable LACs here & there. That might give you a little clue as to what those Ivy applicants are seeking in a 4-yr education (beyond "Mania").</p>
<p>Or perhaps we should just do away with the Ivies altogether, being that they're imperfect (some of them, lol, are "mundane") & contain imperfect students, parents, professors.</p>
<p>When you find the pristine academic environment which can guarantee a student body with 100% virtuousness of motive, do let us know.</p>