<p>I am very concerned with the actions to limit and in subsequent years to perhaps discontinue the Vagina Monologue performance, in addition to the actions to limit the Queer Film Festival - based on the determination that they are not consistent with Catholic teachings. </p>
<p>Though many disapprove and do not like the Vagina Monologues, the fact is that it is a performance that has been associated with V-Day activities (Violance Against Women) at College campus all around the country. Not allowing this to occur in its full scope is going to be perceived, perhaps actually is, an action to limit women's voices.</p>
<p>To limit and/or prevent an established, albeit controversial, voice because of consistency with Catholic teachings is a very dangerous position for a top twenty academic institution of higher learning. </p>
<p>Regardless of my personal opinion, I am concerned that Notre Dame will not be able to continue to maintain its high academic standing with the philosophy and practice of limiting voices inconsistent with Catholic teaching. Many of the "best and brightest" students will not want to go to a school with those limits. Many outstanding faculty will not want to stay or go to a school with those limits. I'm concered this action may enhance the Catholic identity, but severly deteriorate its standing for excellent liberal arts edcuation.</p>
<p>It seems to me that a prefered solution would be to allow the presence of these controversial voices as organized by the student groups and within the resources available at the institution. To not limit it based on the topic. In addition, because of the Catholic identity and the concerns raised by many - to enhance the presense of those in opposition via panel discussions and/or resources for the discussion of the Catholic position on the many issues raised as inappropriate. Doesn't that sound like what would occur at a top twenty academic institution with a Catholic identy?</p>