<p>"does anyone on this board doubt that a top notch Asian candidate (or even white for that matter) may have been turned away to give a spot to Harrison Frist..." (etc.)</p>
<p>I doubt it, or at least have reason to question it. Neither you nor I have particular information relative to either a Frist relative or a Bush relative vs. another candidate. More likely if it was "against" someone else, it would have been "against" a top-scoring Caucasian Anglo with less $$ than those 2 examples. But generally it is not the way it works that specific candidates compete in this way: that tends to be more the case for 2 or more applicants from one particular high school during one round. Overall, decisions are more broadly-based than that. And for every one of your "3 [anecdotal] examples" of admits based supposedly on donations, I can give you more than 3 examples of specific science-fair "types" (though I don't like categorizing, I'm merely following your own template) who WERE admitted, because I have access to some of that information at one "top" U in question.</p>
<p>(1) The points brought up in your post have been made elsewhere, on this and on many similar threads. They have also been refuted by many posters, including & not including myself.</p>
<p>(2) Disagreement, including strong intellectual disagreement, is not rancor. Thats what forums are for: to agree & to disagree. People who find disagreement distasteful should never enter a public forum.</p>
<p>(3) Re: your example of the science fair student. High School Senior versions of precisely the student you describe, are accepted BY THE HUNDREDS by all the top Universities in this country this year, last year, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years ago. They are not discriminated against. They are not belittled. They are not ignored by those Us. They are not passed over. But Ill say it again, although its been said dozens of times on CC, esp. over the last few weeks: there are too many of those science fair (post # 206 ) students for THE MOST POPULAR Universities & colleges to accept UNIVERSALLY. The colleges are not going to increase the existing over-represention at their institutions with this style of student from this ethnic background. They want their institutions to reflect a better DISTRIBUTION of the country and DISTRIBUTION of academic emphasis. So at some point theyre going to hold the line at the number of these that they already accept.</p>
<p>(4) This topic would not even be an issue for discussion, were the type in question willing to go beyond the name institutions for a college education. If fictional & non-fictional science fair student were to seriously diversify the college list, to include the science-heavy west coast colleges such as the Claremont colleges, to include many fine universities in this country outside of HYPSM such as Rice & various Publics, such as U of Chicago, 100% of these students would find challenging & satisfying opportunities for themselves to meet their abilities. In fact, one could argue that a science fair student might find in many cases more opportunities in a less high-profile institution. That student may be received as exceptional, as invaluable, as a leader in his (esp.) field, as the recipient of Honors at graduation, as scholarship recipient with a full ride, as recipient of publishing opportunities all of which leverage said student for an outstanding graduate school leading to a promising career in the field of choice. HYPSM do not have a lock on undergraduate excellence: I say that as the parent of a student at one of those places. Demonstrated excellence is only one factor in an institutions profile; the other factors leading to visibility have much to do with tradition, reputation, marketing, and even folklore including the folklore spread by members of ones nationality and ones SES & ethnic & geographical group. (Thus, I am including NE upper-middle-class Caucasians here as participants in the spreading of folklore.)</p>
<p>And those of us who disagree with the premise of Jian Li's "complaint" do not necessarily support as "flawless" all of the methods & all of the process of "elite college admissions." One position does not imply the other.</p>