<p>@FlaWless007 - You’re thinking about this too narrowly. It sounds like you’re assuming there’s something specific and consistent we’re looking to find across all students and if you don’t demonstrate the “right” set of qualities (whether it’s being narrowly and specifically good at something or being more multifaceted) then you don’t get in. That’s generally not how it works. Some students have lots of moving parts, other have great depth in particular areas. Both can be interesting and compelling as applicants. </p>
<p>Redundancy <em>is</em> bad, but you can have multiple essays pointed at the same issue that don’t say the same thing. Essay #1 deals with your frustration trying to get people to vote in local elections. Essay #2 talks about a false sense of homogeneity your community has because of district gerrymandering. Essay #2 shares your ambition to become an elected offical. </p>
<p>All three of those essays are on the “same topic,” politics broadly and elections specifically, but each has a different approach and shares a different side of your understanding and thoughts. </p>
<p>Also… you’re worrying too much about what everyone else is doing. You’re trying to carve out a space to be “unique” in our applicant pool. It’s important to be distinctive, and to show us your own spin on things, but if you’re picking your topics based on what you think everyone else is doing I think you’re setting yourself up for hard time. We got 18,000 applications last year. It’s <em>REALLY</em> hard to find an essay topic that others aren’t talking about. The strength of your essay isn’t the topic you choose, but the depth and nuance you can bring to your exploration of that topic (and, by extension, the exploration of yourself). If you stay up at night thinking about the Markets (capital M), and you wake up in the morning and the first thing you do is check the futures or the Nikkei, you’re going to have a depth and an excitement around those ideas that others won’t. What will set your essay apart is <em>that</em>, not that you chose to write about stocks. </p>
<p>(And, FlaWless007, I really liked your question… can I turn it into a blog post? Would you mind?)</p>
<p>@HVBaseballDad - so, it shouldn’t be possible to submit the CA/Supp without checking a box for either A&S or Engineering, but who knows, right? The common app this year presents all manner of fun for us to find together. He can email me and I’ll check to see if, indeed, he did make a choice and not realize it. Either way, we’ll sort it out. [Admissions</a> Officers at Tufts](<a href=“http://admissions.tufts.edu/contact/meet-the-team/]Admissions”>Meet the Admissions Team | Tufts Admissions)</p>
<p>@Stemmmm - We never recalculate a GPA. We use whatever the school gives us, letting individual schools decide what they feel should count according to their own educational philosophies, and if we have a weighted GPA then we’ll use that. </p>
<p>There is absolutely no disadvantage in just submitting everything. I have no idea why taking the SATs earlier would be a mistake, as you put it, so as far as I (and thus, Tufts admissions) is concerned, you’ve got nothing to worry about. We ask for everything because of two reasons. A) Score choice would be a waste of your money. And B) more important, is that not everyone has the right guidance to understand what super-scoring is, and a non-trivial group would misunderstand the advantage of score choice and withhold testing that actually benefits them even though the overall score seems lower.</p>
<p>@Daddio3 - It’s sometimes nice to have the AP testing, but there’s no expectation that students will self-report scores. </p>
<p>@Rumble96 - Yup! Superscores!</p>