Barron's 2400 for MATH:) Please look into this one

<p>For the math section, it seems as if the Barron's 2400 did a comprehensive job of trying to apply a range from easy to hard math problems. For those who have used this book, have you come across any math problems from Barron's 2400 that resembles the questions from the the actual SAT or Collegeboard given SAT problems? </p>

<p>Will appreciate all replies!</p>

<p>I bought BARRON’S 2400 but it’s good for people who’s score is 2000+.
My score is 1500/2400 so I’m don’t using it. I used for Math BARRON’S 23rd and Workbook. My score was 460 now is 700-800. I can solve all 54 questions but I need time=(</p>

<p>I get above 2050 on average, and math above 700. I need a solid book that will help me come across the hardest math problems that actually resemble the ones in the SAT.</p>

<p>Well, my SAT score was 1300, and I bought the book for practice. Would it help me?</p>

<p>which book?</p>

<p>Even if Barron’s doesn’t have test questions that model the real ones, it’s worth studying with, especially if you think they explain questions well. Even if there’s a difference between Barrons questions and real SAT questions, they’ll still be covering the same concepts, and it won’t hurt to practice more (if you have the time). Then, use the blue book for real models of the test.</p>

<p>I don’t know if this will help, but I used Barron’s for the SAT II math, which went in depth in some less common concepts and was extremely difficult. It made me cry, actually. But that motivated me to do better and by the time I finished Barron’s and went on to Collegeboard’s book, taking the tests was a breeze because the questions were so much easier. Working with Barron’s helped me understand each concept that might come up on the test, so I was never caught off guard and scored well on the actual SAT. However, if I had only worked with Collegeboard’s book, I might not have taken the test as seriously because it wouldn’t have challenged me as much, and I might have missed a few concepts.</p>