<p>I've heard that barron's are harder than K and PR, and kinda getting the feeling that it might be more accurate as well. </p>
<p>thoughts?</p>
<p>I've heard that barron's are harder than K and PR, and kinda getting the feeling that it might be more accurate as well. </p>
<p>thoughts?</p>
<p>Just get SAT BB</p>
<p>I heard a lot of mixed feelings as well. However, Barron's is harder and might be more acccurate considering the difficulty level. But it also has its down sides. Even though its hard there are still a lot of people who think Barron's teaches OVER BOARD or sumthin. They already had some kind of thread comparing SAT books. In the end, I believe that it depends on the level of the individual. If you have all the basics down and most familiar with the different methods, try Barron's. However, if your starting new and all, better get PR. It isn't that bad. But, I don't know about Kaplan. The only good thing about it, with my personal experience, is its conciseness.</p>
<p>bump if this doesn't make sense. I am just another student who has some experience. :)</p>
<p>"SAT BB" </p>
<p>pretty irrelevant... no duh i use that like 99.999% of everyone else</p>
<p>r u talking about what i said joethemole. pretty harsh there! but i dont understand what your saying. maybe i am that much stupider. anyways, ppl. like more detailed answers cause it gives them a better explanation to choose one thing over the other.</p>