<p>I hear a lot about the Barrons problems being more difficult then the real test. Are they truly harder or simply more time consuming, or both. I can get 750 if i take my time(1h 15-20 mins), but timed I run out the clock early unless I work faster which leads to careless mistakes. Would it be best to focus on speeding up or getting more accurate. If the real test takes smiler time, i need to work faster, but if its like the SATI math where I had a nice 5 minute window to draw pictures at the end of each section</p>
<p>Is time a problem for you when you practice? If you have no prob with time, i’d say go for it. Barrons is tough; if you can get 750+, you’ll get 800 for sure.
I got like 660s 3x in a row in barrons, and got 800 on the math2, but i did get freaked out by the time when i took it…i had like 2 mins left over~~ with few blanks
so if u can get 750+, go for it.time shouldn’t be a concern for u</p>
<p>how is the SATIIC timed compared to SATI. I had plenty of time on satI math sections, will I for the most part be safe in satIIC?</p>
<p>If u r able to get at least 650 on barrons timed. Then an 800 on the actual thing is very possible :d</p>
<p>I’m in the same boat as u dude. I’m using barrons and i’m getting 720-730 on my practice tests (taking about 1 hr 15 minutes to complete) </p>
<p>But after reading this, i guess im on the right track!</p>
<p>only thing is, my dad is FREAKING out cause im getting such a low score : (</p>
<p>p.s. 1st post!</p>
<p>Lol I got 3 780’s on Barron’s(timed) in a row, so I stopped studying,
then on the real thing I was overconfident and rushed… I got 790(■■■)</p>