<p>Well at the end of the day good ole Prescotts money set up all the opportunites for
Bush Sr which set it up for W</p>
<p>presidents are paid $400,000 per year and $50,000 for spending. plus, his parents are oil tycoons, well, that's what i heard. he should be able to afford more</p>
<p>They're making the whole community gated just for him. I don't blame them though because people HATE him</p>
<p>Bush cut all his ties with oil before he entered office...or atleast thats what he portrays to the public. The truth can be found in farenheit 911 though. </p>
<p>All those ties to oil are covered up under someone elses name right now but he did have lots of ties and Micheal Moore backs up his work in this documentary or he could get sued for slander and libel, but once Bush leaves office don't be surprised when it all resurfaces. Read up on other politicians that have left office to have jobs waiting for them in the private sector of businesses that have evidently prospered from their voting records in office, they make great money now. All because they did the right favors for the right companies.</p>
<p>Google 911 conspiracy.
there's a lot of shady ***** going on</p>
<p>People will accept anything the media tells them is true as true. Like people say that Obama is the first black president. He isn't he's 1/16 black</p>
<p>Wow, guys, wow... At least people are thinking of me, even if they are thinking of me as an a$$hole! You're completely out of line, theamazingjasmyn, but hey - you must have just gotten tired of me calling you totally superficial, plastic, and fake! I bet a lot of people would take offense to that - but mostly only those who know that to a certain extent, what people say about them is true...</p>
<p>mpicz is right - I'm a dude... Most normal guys I know don't spend extended periods of time on their looks, nor do they care how many pairs of jeans they own. But guess what - regardless of whether or not it's normal for guys to spend hours on their appearance, I don't have to, know why?
a) I'm pretty normal-looking - it doesn't take hours to get my inch-long hair "in place" and I don't suffer from too much acne, so as long as I'm clean and get enough sleep, I'm happy with how I look!
b) I have great friends who don't care how each other look because they realize that it shouldn't matter among friends! It's all about personality. I don't feel pressure to become some kind of metro man-god because it simply isn't worth the time and I'm comfortable with myself.
c) There's little point in spending time on it. Practices get me sweaty and my hair soaked, so any time I did spend on man-grooming would be wasted as soon as I stepped onto the court.
d) I don't want to ever be associated or compared with plastic barbie dolls like you two.</p>
<p>And you know, fine, give me the ugly squash - it doesn't matter how it looks, it's what's inside. BAM...</p>
<p>I'm not a little plastic barbie I bet you i could beat you at any sport (except ike football or a sport like that but your british so you dont play football anyway) I'm not saying you should spend hours on your hair and clothes that would be kind of gay but you shouldnt hate on girls for doing it.</p>
<p>Wow, she's a bigot as well! I bet schools would love to know that you use homosexuality as a negative term for use in insults, it's really... cultured and politically correct, you know, since it is, after all, 1950 and it's still fine to treat black people, gays, and anyone who isn't the same as you as a substandard individual</p>
<p>I don't hate you because you care about your looks. I simply dislike your attitude towards the whole looks thing...</p>
<p>I wasn't using the word gay in a negative way as an insult I was just saying that most of the guys who spend hours on their hair and clothes and everything are gay. Honestly if I met a guy like that I would automatically assume they were gay most straight guys don't do that.</p>
<p>OK, how about we stop stereotyping gay people... if you try to link any group of people with something that you consider irregular, I'd call that insulting.</p>
<p>Anyways...</p>
<p>Well if you're with a guy and he spends longer getting ready than you do that is a huge red flag</p>
<p>Oh no, red flag him... he might be a HOMOSEXUAL! They are vicious creatures, you know</p>
<p>Anyway, even I can't believe how much we've deviated from the original thread topic. Maybe it's because I'm just such an a$$hole</p>
<p>If your boyfriend or whatever is spending more time getting ready than you are he's probably gay so why would you waste you're time with him?</p>
<p>Why would you want a gay boyfriend that's kind of pointless</p>
<p>I just mean in general. But chances are that if he's gay you'd know without having to observe his tendencies in dressing. Also he probably wouldn't initiate a relationship with you, a girl, in the first place. But hey, clearly you are the expert on homosexuality here, so I'll just take your word for everything.</p>
<p>Now let's both leave this topic behind and either both stop harassing this poor thread or just get back on topic. Unfortunately I can see the subject of homosexuality getting pretty heated</p>
<p>There are guys that'll do that anyways you're the one calling me bigot how does any of this make me a bigot I wasn't saying it in a negative way at all my real point was anyways back on topic you shouldn't dislike someone for the amount of time they spend on looks you're saying i'm superficial and i'm not</p>
<p>I don't know, after some of your posts... who was it who straightens their hair in class?</p>
<p>Ahem anyway</p>
<p>It wasn't me it was this other girl i just said it was funny i wouldn't do it in class anyways she didn't actually do a great job she didn't have a real big mirror</p>
<p>Thank you TomTheCat for standing up for society. theamazingjasmyn, you are very stereotypical. I certainly hope I do not end up at the same school is you. I am a girl, and always spend less than 10 minutes on my hair/makeup/etc. I have perfectly good hygiene, and I have a hunch that people who spend hours on their looks do so to make up for a lack of smarts.</p>