Big Ten Expansion - Phase II

<p>Big Ten might pick Big Apple</p>

<p>By LENN ROBBINS
Last Updated: 5:55 AM, July 24, 2010
Posted: 3:08 AM, July 24, 2010</p>

<p>In about 10 days, the nation's college sports media will descend on Chicago for the Big Ten's football media days. No doubt the focus of attention will be on the league's 12th member, Nebraska, and on the commissioner's podium. </p>

<p>What is Jim Delany, widely considered the most powerful man in college football, thinking about his continuing quest to make the Big Ten a league of its own? How about making it in the Big Apple? </p>

<p>The Big Ten commissioner, a South Orange native and North Carolina graduate, knows full well the value of the D.C.-to-Boston corridor, whose epicenter is New York. </p>

<p>"Anyone who forgets that forgets at their peril," Delany told The Post in a telephone interview. "It's the center, it has been the center of media activity for a hundred years. It's the center of financial activity and it has been that way for 150 years. To me it's sort of where a lot of things start in the county." </p>

<p>And in terms of college football, the East Coast is where the sports expansion could find its end game. </p>

<p>Delaney would not talk specifically about expansion, but he reiterated the league's initial stance in December 2009 of studying the issue over a 12-to-18 month period. A college football presence in the metropolitan area remains very high. </p>

<p>"For us it's important," Delany said. "We haven't been there except through Penn State. Our teams play in the Garden. They play in the Meadowlands. They play teams out East. They play in the NIT. They play in the ACC. </p>

<p>"I consider the East Coast to be as important to us as the West Coast is even though the West Coast has got the Rose Bowl and the Big Ten-Pac-10 relationship," Delany added. "And it's so because of the recruitment of students, the recruitment of athletes, the size and scope of the markets. I hope it becomes more important." </p>

<p>Coincidence or not, the Big East -- which has come to absorb expansion tremors the way Californians shrug off earthquakes that register at the low end of the Richter scale -- will host its media days at the same time as the Big Ten. The ACC's media days are Monday and Tuesday. </p>

<p>Those leagues contain programs of most appeal in addition to Notre Dame, an independent, and Missouri of the Big 12 because of their markets. When the Big 12 imposed a mid-June deadline on its members to decide whether to stay or go, it forced the Big Ten and Nebraska to move up the timetable. </p>

<p>But the Big Ten's clock still is ticking, and FBS schools in the Boston (Boston College), New York (Rutgers and Syracuse) and Washington, D.C. (Maryland) markets prime properties. Should the Big East lose two members and/or the ACC lose Maryland, a charter member that is cash-strapped, it could reshape the Eastern seaboard. </p>

<p>Delany remembers the days when Fordham, the Ivy League and the service academies were the toast of college football. But as professional sports grew in popularity, college sports faded in New York. Delany said he wasn't certain if the New York market would support the sport the way it is in L.A. or Chicago, but he knows a middle-of-the-pack program won't appeal to New Yorkers, who get the inaugural Pinstripe Bowl to be played in Yankee Stadium this December. </p>

<p>"We'll see how some of the other bowl games, which may not be top tier, produce," Delany said. "My sense about that bowl was, 'It's great to be in New York but you better come with your 'A' game . . . because I don't think the New York market really responds to anything but the 'A' game." </p>

<h2>Link: Big</a> Ten might pick Big Apple - NYPOST.com</h2>

<p>Finally, THE Seismic Change!! lol~</p>

<p>Q: This is a good morning to talk to you with everything that’s happening in college football. What would Nebraska bring to the Big Ten?</p>

<p>A: I have obviously pushed for one or two Eastern teams. I think that would help us with the television markets, our fans and our basketball program.</p>

<p>Nebraska obviously has had a great tradition and certainly would be a quality addition. I don’t know if that’s the only one (school) they (Big Ten presidents) are going to go for. Are they going to go for Missouri? Are they going to go for two out there and two in the East?</p>

<p>I think Notre Dame had a shot at it. I think there are some other schools that would be better, to me, for the whole situation. That would be a place like Rutgers, which would bring the New York-New Jersey television market into the Big Ten (Network). It also would help recruiting. Notre Dame would not be one of my top picks.</p>

<p>Link: [Paterno</a> talks football and more](<a href=“http://readingeagle.com/article.aspx?id=236852]Paterno”>http://readingeagle.com/article.aspx?id=236852)</p>

<p>Ready For More Expansion Talk?</p>

<p>July 26th, 2010 ║ Posted By: John Pennington </p>

<p>If you thought all the expansion hullabaloo of May and June was in our collective rearview mirror, think again. The Big Ten still has its eyes open.</p>

<p>According to a weekend piece penned by Len Robbins of The New York Post, the Big Ten is still interested in adding Eastern teams located along the Boston-New York-DC corridor.</p>

<p>“It’s the center, it has been the center of media activity for a hundred years,” said Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany. “It’s the center of financial activity and it has been that way for 150 years. To me it’s sort of where a lot of things start in the country.</p>

<p>“I consider the East Coast to be as important to us as the West Coast is even though the West Coast has got the Rose Bowl and the Big Ten-Pac-10 relationship. And it’s so because of the recruitment of students, the recruitment of athletes, the size and scope of the markets. I hope it becomes more important.”</p>

<p>The author of the piece points out that the Big Ten’s original “12 to 18 month” expansion schedule is winding down. “… FBS schools in the Boston (Boston College), New York (Rutgers and Syracuse) and Washington, DC (Maryland) markets” are “prime properties.” “Should the Big East lose two members and/or the ACC lose Maryland, a charter member that is cash-strapped, it could reshape the Eastern seaboard.”</p>

<p>Could the Big Ten expand to 16 by grabbing BC, Maryland, Rutgers and Syracuse? And if so, would the SEC feel the need to keep pace via expansion maneuvers of its own? </p>

<p>As we saw in June, Mike Slive made a pretty strong push to land Texas A&M and Oklahoma… only to lose out to a rejiggered Big 12. The SEC supposedly has no desire to “attack” a league that stands on solid ground, but if the ACC lost one or more teams to the Big Ten, would Slive and crew make a move on Florida State or Georgia Tech or Miami, Clemson, Virginia Tech, North Carolina, Duke, etc, etc?</p>

<p>This final version of this expansion story has yet to be penned.</p>

<p>Link: [Ready</a> For More Expansion Talk? MrSEC.com](<a href=“http://www.mrsec.com/2010/07/ready-for-more-expansion-talk/]Ready”>News Archives - Mr Sec | Top sports news, scores and opinions)</p>

<p>Best Expansion Scenarios IMHO:</p>

<p>Option #1 (by revenue)
TX, ND, Rutgers, Maryland or BC</p>

<p>Option #2 (by academic)
ND, Rutgers, UVA, Cornell or BC</p>

<p>Option #3 (at least we’ve got ND)
ND, Rutgers, Missouri, Syracuse or Pitt</p>

<p>The final version of this expansion story has yet to be penned, but it surely is starting to be quite annoying and silly.</p>

<p>Big Twenty or Sweet Sixteen? Are we really supposed to care? Make up your mind and be done with it. The rest of the country will be fine as their conferences prepare for yet another championship game.</p>

<p>By the way, it is pretty obvious that Texas had little to no interest in joining the Big 10. Especially since all they had to do is “hinting” at being remotely interested! The fact Texas decided to stick to a “small” conference speaks volume about the appeal of the old Big 10 and its planned expansionary moves to the East and continuous pompom waving.</p>

<p>I’d kind of be sad to see Maryland leave the ACC, but Pitt would be a better program to have if they were the replacement. BC has been a bust, and UConn would be better long term. Private schools just aren’t smart long term.</p>

<p>Rutgers is the only school with an outside shot of being New York’s team. Boston will never have a college team the city follows unless the Ivy League makes a comeback.</p>

<p>Rutgers, please, please, please.</p>

<p>Frankly, none of the NE corridor schools really incite too much excitement within their respective TV markets.</p>

<p>The addition of BC has been a disappointment for the ACC and the Cuse-RU game (despite 2 “large-market” schools) was relegated to ESPN360 last year.</p>

<p>Even UMD doesn’t garner a rabid fanbase in MD.</p>

<p>Delaney needs to be very careful since adding additional schools would just be more mouths to feed w/o necessarily increasing TV revenues sufficiently.</p>

<p>Out of all those schools, RU would seem to be the best bet based on (1) potential and (2) having the benefit of the NYC media covering the B10 conference heavily (for this, it wouldn’t really matter whether RU’s FB team is any good or not) - but adding more than 1 NE corridor school would probably require the addition of a traditional FB power w/ a large fanbase (basically ND or UT and I don’t see that happening anytime in the near future).</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>UT, first and foremost, wanted to keep the Big12 alive so that it could, alone, reap the benefits of its UT Lonestar Network.</p>

<p>Basically, w/ the updated ESPN deal (ESPN was a big, big player - overpaying for the ACC and the B12 since they are very afraid of Fox Sports affiliated conference networks like the BTN), the status quo remains for the near future, but don’t be surprised at all if we revisit raiding the B12 again in the future.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Was that the sole --or primay-- reason Texas made sure the Big12 did not become a casualty? How much would Texas have lost by joining a different conference? How much would smaller schools such as Baylor have lost? </p>

<p>Texas is hardly the Mother Teresa of college football, but neither are the heads of the conferences who were cajoling Austin. </p>

<p>The simplest conclusion is that Texas was and remains one of the most attractive team for ANY conference, and that despite this the school decided to stay put and show some loyalty to its peers. That Texas was able to do so without committing harakiri is a testament to its own value, and not to the generosity of others. It also seemed to have worked out quite nicely for the schools that did not bolt for greener pastures or, shall we say greener apples!</p>

<p>Option #1 (by revenue)
TX, ND, Rutgers, Maryland or BC</p>

<p>Option #2 (by academic)
ND, Rutgers, UVA, Cornell or BC</p>

<p>Texas is better academically than Rutgers…</p>

<p>^^ Right, Texas > Rutgers academically!! My bad… ;p
Also, I think TAMU will join the SEC at the end!!!
Now, whether UT will join the Pac-10 when Big-12 vaporized, remains a mystery…</p>

<p>Texas A&M Athletic Director Bill Byrne Lashes Out At Aggie Alum - KBTX News 3
<a href=“Texas A&M Athletic Director Bill Byrne Lashes Out At Aggie Alum - KBTX News 3 - Shane McAuliffe - YouTube”>Texas A&M Athletic Director Bill Byrne Lashes Out At Aggie Alum - KBTX News 3 - Shane McAuliffe - YouTube;

<p>Personally, I’m not sure adding Rutgers would benefit any conference as much as one would think, if only due to the fact that out here, the sports universe is more pro-oriented with the Yankees and Giants (will not include the lesser two teams related to them) as well as the fact that at its peak, Rutgers has only seen very moderate success.</p>

<p>Nebraska says so long to Big 12 with plenty of ill will</p>

<p>July 26, 2010
By Dennis Dodd
CBSSports.com Senior Writer</p>

<p>DALLAS – Nebraska coach Bo Pelini began the Big 12 media days by saying he would not take any questions about the Big Ten. Then, of course, he took questions on the Big Ten. Lots of them, because the prevailing emotion in Nebraska this year is something close to hate. </p>

<p>Hate that it had to come to this. Hate that Nebraska had to leave behind decades of tradition to start over in a richer, yet foreign, league. </p>

<p>A hate of Texas. </p>

<p>The dislike has been percolating for 15 years since economics, television and sponsors dictated that Nebraska and Texas become conference partners. The Big 12 they called it, and they might still call it that, but it will be without Nebraska. </p>

<p>The “partnership” disintegrated June 11 when the school rather flamboyantly and pointedly announced its divorce from Texas and the Big 12. Somewhere in there was language about joining the Big Ten but that was almost subtext to what was happening. </p>

<p>Basically, given an ultimatum to declare its loyalty to the Big 12, Nebraska shoved its middle finger in the air and instead accepted an invite from the Big Ten 6½ weeks ago. The Huskers begin play next season. </p>

<p>Monday, then, was a going away party. Going far away. Nebraska AD Tom Osborne wasn’t here – he’ll be at next week’s Big Ten media days instead. Texas is at the opposite end of the rotation, appearing last before the media on Wednesday morning. </p>

<p>“It’s not about being angry about something or revenge or anything like that,” Pelini said of the very much hyped Oct. 16 meeting with Texas. “It’s about competing and executing.” </p>

<p>And that’s where you had to stifle a laugh. It’s a lot about anger and revenge. Pelini is a Big Ten guy – an Ohio State guy – who played for Earle Bruce and John Cooper. He coaches like he played – with something to prove at every moment. </p>

<p>Nebraska has spent a decade-and-a-half ceding administrative and athletic power to Texas in the Big 12. In that time, Nebraska lost Osborne the coach to retirement and went from national power to Big 12 North also-ran. In 1998, Texas hired Mack Brown and the program took off. It has played for two national championships, winning one, while reeling off 12 consecutive seasons of at least nine victories. </p>

<p>It was also noticed by many that Texas became the richest athletic department in the country (annual budget: $138 million) during Brown’s reign. </p>

<p>And Nebraska’s downturn. </p>

<p>The Huskers now believe they are back. Pelini said as much after a shutout of Arizona in the Holiday Bowl. One thing, though. They haven’t won the Big 12 or beaten Texas since 1999. That’s why the schools’ final conference meeting in Lincoln has become a one-game brawl to settle it all for some in Huskerland. </p>

<p>There’s a good chance both will be ranked in the top 10 with the prospect looming for a rematch in the Big 12 championship game. </p>

<p>Nebraska’s own marketing department summarized the rancor in a promotional video. The presentation starts out innocently enough celebrating the football program’s work ethic and success. But in the final few seconds – which you won’t see in the link – it quickly shifts to a single-minded football jihad against the Longhorns. It ends with what looks like a logo drawn up especially for the game urging fans to “Wear Red, Be Loud, Beat Texas.” </p>

<p>The video has since been altered to remove a reference to Texas. </p>

<p>“It was actually a mistake,” Pelini said. “To be honest with you I wasn’t real happy about it.” </p>

<p>Nebraska was used to having its way in the old Big Eight. It usually played Oklahoma for the Orange Bowl berth each year and that was that. Everything else was details. </p>

<p>But things changed when Texas came in the room back in the mid-1990s and declared that the new Big 12 would not allow partial qualifiers. That’s where it started for Nebraska. Osborne had built part of his empire on kids who just needed a chance. They didn’t have either the minimum grade-point average or high enough SAT test score. They could achieve initial eligibility with one or other but they were labeled. Prop 48s they called them, a nickname derived from the NCAA legislation. </p>

<p>“I was on the [Big 12] task force,” said former Iowa State AD Gene Smith, now with Ohio State. "I’ll never forget when [Texas] came in the room. </p>

<p>“Texas would not come into the league unless we eliminated the Prop 48 deal. Nebraska lived on it. Oh my God, it was like heat across the board. The animosity started back then.” </p>

<p>The final straw might have been December’s one-point loss to Texas in the Big 12 championship game. In a weird, parallel universe you can almost imagine none of this happening had the Huskers finally gotten over on Texas. </p>

<p>If Nebraska holds on, it gets its first Big 12 title in a decade. Everyone feels good. There’s a BCS bowl. Things are looking up. Maybe Nebraska rides out the wave of conference upheaval without looking elsewhere. </p>

<p>Instead, the frustration continued. After Colt McCoy almost frittered the game away running around the backfield, a second was added back on the clock, allowing Hunter Lawrence to kick the game-winning field goal. That it was absolutely the right call by the officials solidified once again Nebraska had become Texas’ caddy. </p>

<p>The animosity has carried over. The Omaha World-Herald reported that one Seward, Neb. farmer discovered a longhorn head at a nearby slaughterhouse. He rushed home, got his camera and Nebraska hat, rushed back, grabbed hold of the horns and had his picture taken with the 150-pound dismembered head. He’s thinking about making a T-shirt out of it for Texas game day. </p>

<p>Nebraska fans’ reputation as the world’s nicest is going to be tested on Oct. 16. In 1998, Texas came into Memorial Stadium and upset Nebraska with soon-to-be Heisman winner Ricky Williams. The crowd applauded, like it does for every opponent, as Texas left the field. </p>

<p>This time? </p>

<p>The Big Ten had put everyone on notice – and edge – in December with its intention to explore expansion. Nebraska’s name had been on the periphery while most thought that Missouri was a goner from the Big 12. </p>

<p>Ohio State coach Jim Tressel was in Lincoln for a Fellowship of Christian Athletes speech in the spring. During a tour of Nebraska’s athletic facilities, Osborne became more inquisitive about Big Ten expansion. </p>

<p>"Right near the end of the tour he said, ‘Do you know anything about expansion?’ Tressel recalled. "I said, ‘We’re not privy to any of that.’ </p>

<p>“I could tell just from his tone that he was probably privy … I just sensed when I was there that there was more of a heritage there about being part of the Big Eight. And that they didn’t feel as if the Big 12 had the same kind of heritage.” </p>

<p>At the same time Nebraska fans are celebrating a move to a perceived higher academic and athletic plane beginning next season, they are seething that it ever came to that. Nebraska is part of a core of schools in the Big 12 that have been together in a conference for more than a century. </p>

<p>There weren’t any lines to read after Osborne and chancellor Harvey Perlman stood before the Nebraska board of regents on June 11 and basically accused Texas of running it out of the Big 12. Half the league, Texas included, was seriously considering a move to the Pac-10. That would have broken up the Big 12. </p>

<p>“Nebraska did not start this discussion …,” Perlman said. “The Big Ten offered stability the Big 12 could not offer.” </p>

<p>That was on a Friday. Colorado had left the day before for the Pac-10. It looked like the Big 12 had dissolved and the age of the super conference was upon us. By Tuesday, the league had stepped away from the brink and decided to continue on with 10 schools. </p>

<p>As the Big 12 gathered for one of the last times as a group on Monday, everybody was happy. </p>

<p>Or as happy as they could be at a going away party. </p>

<p>Link: <a href=“http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/13671544/nebraska-says-so-long-to-big-12-with-plenty-of-ill-will[/url]”>http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/13671544/nebraska-says-so-long-to-big-12-with-plenty-of-ill-will&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>ACC’s Swofford not shutting door on expansion possibilities</p>

<p>July 26, 2010
By Dennis Dodd
CBSSports.com Senior Writer</p>

<p>GREENSBORO, NC – So you thought expansion was dead? At least for a while, right? </p>

<p>ACC commissioner John Swofford barely gave us time to catch our breath Sunday at the ACC media days. Just when you thought things were settling down, the mild-mannered Swofford ratcheted up the expansion angst. </p>

<p>“History would tell you there are going to be periodic shifts,” Swofford said during his annual state-of-the-league press conference. “It may mean 10 years. It may mean 20 years. A lot of this has settled at 12 for a period. Up to 12 [teams] it seems to work pretty well.” </p>

<p>But, Swofford added, the league has studied 14- and 16-team structures. </p>

<p>“We know what it would look like and what the advantages and disadvantages would be,” he said. “It gets a lot more complicated. There’s a reason it hasn’t happened. But that doesn’t mean it won’t happen.” </p>

<p>College athletics stopped short of ushering in the age of the super conference this summer. When Texas decided to stay in the Big 12, it halted Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott’s six-team raid. The only shifts were by Nebraska (to the Big Ten), Boise State (to the Mountain West) and Colorado and Utah (to the Pac-10). </p>

<p>Before those moves, it was the ACC that clumsily raided the Big East five years ago. The results have been mixed with the league losing traction as the nation’s top basketball conference. A case can be made for expansion making ACC football worse. Florida State and Miami have struggled to remain on the national scene while the ACC has moved to 2-10 in BCS bowls all time. </p>

<p>The slippage since expansion didn’t hurt the conference’s negotiating power. It recently agreed to a $1.86 billion, 12-year bundled deal with ESPN. For the first time, the ACC football and basketball contracts rest in one place. An ESPN official said that any change in conference membership would cause the contract to be adjusted immediately. </p>

<p>The Big 12 lost two members over the summer but the network said it would honor the terms of the original contract which runs for five more years. </p>

<p>“Before we went to 12 we were not positioned to be at the highest level,” Swofford said. “It [expansion] strengthened us overall. Beyond that, I don’t know. There may be a diminishing return [beyond 12].” </p>

<p>Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany has said the league will “pause” after inviting Nebraska in June. However, there has been speculation about the Big Ten’s interest in Maryland and/or Georgia Tech. Both schools would bring a market (Atlanta and Washington-Baltimore) for the Big Ten Network. Also, it would open up lucrative recruiting territories to the Big Ten. It also fits with Delany’s claim that population drain from the Rust Belt is reason enough to expand. </p>

<p>Link: [ACC’s</a> Swofford not shutting door on expansion possibilities - NCAA Football - CBSSports.com](<a href=“http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/13670525/accs-swofford-not-shutting-door-on-expansion-possibilities]ACC’s”>http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/13670525/accs-swofford-not-shutting-door-on-expansion-possibilities)</p>

<p>“We will continue to study expansion throughout this year. It would not surprise me if we continue to expand. We’ve always talked about and had research done that we haven’t taken full advantage of Penn State being in the east and we need someone else in the league from the east to maximize Penn State. It wouldn’t surprise me if we went that way.”</p>

<p>Source: [Wisconsin</a>’ Barry Alvarez: Big Ten may look east to add another school | freep.com | Detroit Free Press](<a href=“http://www.freep.com/article/20100730/SPORTS08/100730001/1355/SPORTS/Alvarez-Big-Ten-may-look-east-to-add-another-school]Wisconsin”>http://www.freep.com/article/20100730/SPORTS08/100730001/1355/SPORTS/Alvarez-Big-Ten-may-look-east-to-add-another-school)</p>

<p>^ JoePa wants Rutgers for recruiting, marketing, and alumni reasons. From Penn State’s point of view it’s a no-brainer, giving them a natural rival to their immediate East to complement their still-budding rivalry with Ohio State to their West, and extending their reach into the NY/NJ market where they’ve got tens of thousands of alumni. With Alvarez saying what he’s saying, I wouldn’t be surprised if JoePa gets what he wants.</p>

<p>Geographically Fit - We will take the East Coast over the South imho!!</p>

<p>Recently, I’ve come to the realization that Big Ten Expansion DOES NOT necessary have to include either Notre Dame or Texas!! So long as we can secure part of the vast TV markets from MA (Boston, New England Region)-NJ-NY (NYC) corridor as well as Washington D.C. (Maryland, Baltimore Region) area, the expansion in my book is rated as a huge success!! Therefore, without further ado, I would like to suggest adding the following schools to our conference:</p>

<ol>
<li>Rutgers (rising football program, large public, certain to expand BTN cable markets, good academics)</li>
<li>Syracuse (good academics with great football tradition; however, it is seen as more of a bball school as of late)</li>
<li>Boston College (the only legit college football program in beantown, great academics) *IMHO, MA-NJ-NY corridor would be solidified with these three!! (legit in both academics and athletics - football$ in particular!!)<br></li>
<li>Maryland
(typical big ten public school with good academics, decent football program, another A+ in terms of adding BTN cable market)</li>
</ol>

<p>Alternatives:
UVA (great academics, ave football program w/ limited fanbase)
Pitt (good football / academic, yet limited cable market)</p>

<p>Current Big Ten Map:</p>

<p><a href=“http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/92/BigTenUSAMap.png[/url]”>http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/92/BigTenUSAMap.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>ps. I’ve decided to take UConn off my alternative list! Even with the recent minor success of its football program, the school really is more of a basketball only school imo. Plus, it really does not have whole lot to offer, so long as we grab Rutgers, Syracuse & BC from that region.</p>

<p>If Clemson goes to the Big Ten or SEC, I wouldn’t mind that. ACC football is somewhat pathetic compared to other leagues and admit it, Clemson isn’t a basketball school so I could care less if we lose competitive basketball.</p>

<p>The Metropolitan Statistical Areas are shown in red on this enlargeable map of the Core Based Statistical Areas of the United States.</p>

<p>[File:Core</a> Based Statistical Areas.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Core_Based_Statistical_Areas.png]File:Core”>File:Core Based Statistical Areas.png - Wikipedia)</p>

<p>Just realized that I had left out ‘Mizzou’ as one of my top alternative picks!! </p>

<p>Missouri (decent academics, good football/basketball, good TV markets - St. Louis & Kansas City, typical Big Ten-like school, geographically fit)</p>

<p>I guess we will have to wait after Big Ten officials’ meeting (next Monday) for further update regarding to either the expansion or division here in Chicago.</p>