Biology SAT 2 Question

<p>Is the Princeton Review Biology adequate enough to self study for the sat2? I'm aiming for a 700~, and if I read the book cover to cover twice...would I be able to achieve a 700+? Like I said, I'm not aiming for a perfect, just a decent/good score, and I don't really have that much time to study for it. However there are a few things thats missing from the pr book: structure of the eye and ear and stuff...are those going to be tested?</p>

<p>I also have a question about the scale for the test. For those of you who have taken it, how was it? How many wrong is an 800/750/700/650? Cuz it's different for every book that I checked it in.</p>

<p>anyone????</p>

<p>I didn't use any review book and received a 750. Most of the information is logic. Are you taking/ did you take an AP Biology course? If so, the AP test multiple choice is about the same. Biology curriculum is pretty similar between courses (basic bio, AP bio, anatomy)</p>

<p>I don't remember anything about eyes/ears on the SATII, maybe I just got lucky, because I wouldn't have been able to do anything. However, they did ask about the heart, and they'll probably change that to a different organ.</p>

<p>I missed quite a few too, at least from what I talked to my</p>

<p>Yeah, its enough (personal experience)</p>

<p>no I took bio freshmen year and I've already forgotten everything...so PR itself is good enough?</p>

<p>I honestly think that a combination of Barrons and Princeton Review is the combination to go for you. I used the Barrons book, read every word, and did every practice test and came out with a 790. Whoops, i forgot to mention I took AP Bio. But I think that Barrons and Princeton Review have all the info needed to score at least a 700</p>

<p>try barron's. You'll find that some information that was not in PR is in barron's.</p>