<p>The question is copied like below.</p>
<p>The author develops the third paragraph(lines 43-66) by presenting
(a) different sides of a single issue(no way)
(b) details that culminate in truth(nothing of the sort)
(c) a thesis followed by specific illustrations(kind of...Im not sure)
(d) a common argument followed by a refutation of it(nope, definetely not)
(e) a common opinion and the reasons it is held(kind of...Is this a common opinion that he used? not sure)</p>
<p>Well, narrowing down by (c) and (e) I chose (e)...and the answer is (c) for my disbelief.</p>
<p>The passage is fairly easy...It is about "bats."</p>
<p>The third passage starts from the writer's position. It is sort of statement. </p>
<p>To paraphrase it, bats have had negative images in human history.
After this sentence, all the other sentences support this one. </p>
<p>So, the author said his opinion, and supported with the concrete examples. </p>
<p>But, I got wrong....Why...</p>
<p>Is this about the word "always" that appears in the first sentence of the third paragraph??</p>
<p>Does this only word differentiate the author's thesis from a common opinion??</p>
<p>Please help me through this one... I can't understand it by my own..</p>