<p>The evidence for the passage regarding mars:
Was it:
a. Topographical Vs. Mineralogy
b. Visual Vs. Intuitive</p>
<p>'a' make sense because the first one uses terrain features for water, and carbonates in the second passage.</p>
<p>'b' also makes sense. The evidence was visual observation (satellites) of canyons. Using carbonates to determine water requires the use of intuition/insight as evidence because they are an indirect way to evaluate the problem.</p>
<p>Last question on the Writing section about where a sentence should be placed.</p>
<p>Quote from psyence5150</p>
<p>"So I gather, most people put "before sentence 5" because they see it as a topic sentence. But a topic sentence for what? The book is BOTH a spiritual autobiography and a slave narrative. Moreover, paragraph 2 considers itself with spiritual growth, over moral awakening. Having that sentence as a transition digresses from the author's main point.
Secondly, "after sentence 10" actually fits better than "Before sentence 10."
Sentence 10 is the topic sentence of the last paragraph; to paraphrase, it mentions how Euponia changes his perspective about slavery. So the whole third paragraph would flow something like this:
1 He changed his views slavery
2 Such moral awakenings are common in spiritual autobiographies
3 Euponia's moral awakening about slavery occured because of his acquiring worldliness through travele"</p>
<p>I personally agree, and would like to hear a stronger counterpoint as the majority seems to disagree with this viewpoint.</p>