<p>I’m not a woman, you pathetic moron. If you had any reading comprehension skills, you’d know that.</p>
<p>Thank you though for reading some of my posts, even if you can’t follow what I say. On the UMass board, a kid - meaning a know nothing like yourself - showed up and started saying that UConn is absolutely better than UMass, that it gets a ton more money, that it gets more state funding, when in actuality UMass gets tens of millions more in grant money and the same state funding. Apparently that is all because the basketball program makes the school so great. Now, tell me why research money when you’re interested in engineering isn’t important? Tell me why research money doesn’t reflect how a school is viewed by the funding agencies.</p>
<p>The dolt from UConn also started arguing about who would do better and, believe it or not, there are actual statistics that show no earnings difference between the schools - or frankly between almost all the schools - with the major differences being attributable to location, meaning literally where the school is in the country - which is yet another reason why ratings are a heap of garbage for the gullible. (And please, for anyone else, don’t bring up the outliers like Harvard because that’s not the point.)</p>
<p>Also, tell me why Northeastern gets $40M in external grants and BC gets about that. The numbers are elsewhere in the thread. Research grants are given to programs that deserve them. BU gets well over $300M. Comparison? (Try addition and subtraction, if this point is too hard to follow.) BU is a major research university and Northeastern is not and neither is BC.</p>