<p>To expand on what my mom wrote above, I’ve had the following professors. I’ve also listed the classes for which I’ve had them, for the benefit of any other math student who is signing up for classes.</p>
<p>Martin Evans (MATH 146, Honors Calculus II): Hilarious, eccentric, and just an overall interesting guy. If I remember correctly, his tests are 10 questions, but you only have to do 7, so just pick the ones you can do and you’ll be fine. Highly recommend.</p>
<p>Cecelia Laurie (MATH 227, Calculus III): Nice and exceptionally talented at teaching. Her explanations are crystal clear, and her tests are very reasonable. (Watch out for the final though; it’s considerably harder than the tests.) Highly recommend.</p>
<p>Vo Liem (MATH 237, Applied Matrix Theory): Awful. I got a very good grade in the class, but I feel like I learned nothing. He spent most of his time making mistakes on the board and then reworking a problem 30 times trying to figure out where he went wrong. His accent is also rather difficult to understand. Do not recommend.</p>
<p>Shan Zhao (MATH 238, Applied Differential Equations I): Loved him. His accent is a little difficult at first, but you get used to it fast. Very fair tests and his frequent quizzes (of which he drops several) reflect the homework and keep you fresh on the material. He is also the only math professor I’ve had at the university who put bonus questions on his tests, another plus. Highly recommend.</p>
<p>Jim Gleason (MATH 402, History of Mathematics): He’s definitely a guy who likes to understand the WHY and not the how (and that’s also how he teaches), but I feel like I’ve learned A LOT in this class. He seems really concerned with making sure students understand the fundamentals and don’t get into the habit of just plugging into a formula to get an answer. Nevertheless, it’s really easy to do well in his class if you try. Sidenote about this class: This inappropriately-named class is actually way more math than history, but nevertheless, it’s a fun class with a useful Writing designation. It’s also really easy to do well in this class. Almost every student ended up with an A or B. Highly recommend.</p>
<p>Layachi Hadji (MATH 411, Introduction to Numerical Analysis): He’s a good lecturer, but I actually found him to be arrogant and rather condescending. It seems like he expects you to read his mind when doing his homework assignments “his way” for this class. His tests were no cakewalk either. Nevertheless, he seems to scale the class so that the people who fared the best still ended up with a good grade. Recommend, with reservations.</p>
<p>Bruce Trace (MATH 486, Introduction to Real Analysis I): HARD CLASS, but Trace is an excellent lecturer and a brilliant guy. He explains calculus beautifully, and he’s also really nice. His grading policy (which from what I understand is the same for every course he teaches) is pretty interesting. The final can either be 40% of your grade in the course – with the other 60% coming from tests – or 100% of your grade (yeah, you read that right). The latter option I used myself to scrape out a good grade in the course. Highly recommend.</p>
<p>I haven’t had the following professors, but I’d still watch out for them.
Alexander Frenkel: His reputation precedes him as the most ridiculously difficult math professor at the university.
Joseph Neggers: The fact that he doesn’t let his students take notes during his lectures (yes, I’m serious) automatically earns him a thumbs down in my book.
Stavros Belbas: I’ve heard he teaches a pretty dang difficult Calculus III class.</p>