Dartmouth falls outside top 150 schools in 2010 world rankings

<p>If you thought Forbes was bad (placing Dartmouth at #30), ARWU 2010 places Dartmouth outside the top 150 schools worldwide, leaving it unranked among schools in the 151-200 range.</p>

<p>AFP:</a> Harvard tops Chinese university rankings for eighth year</p>

<p>The full list can be accessed through <a href="http://www.arwu.org%5B/url%5D"&gt;www.arwu.org&lt;/a> but the site is down at the moment so you might want to try accessing it through this second-hand site that has a pdf version:
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CCoQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Fmmpub%2Fedt%2Fdoc%2F20100812%2F1398457_5eeb_arwu2010.pdf&ei=qOxkTLCHKoOfnQes8eGpDA&usg=AFQjCNFtb2I60UZ_cOCc3LdHGItyqbZtoA&sig2=zQ3NzxoEBJWRXtVe9Tkhjg%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CCoQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Fmmpub%2Fedt%2Fdoc%2F20100812%2F1398457_5eeb_arwu2010.pdf&ei=qOxkTLCHKoOfnQes8eGpDA&usg=AFQjCNFtb2I60UZ_cOCc3LdHGItyqbZtoA&sig2=zQ3NzxoEBJWRXtVe9Tkhjg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>Cool. ARWU is primarily a graduate school ranking. Dartmouth focuses primarily on undergrad education. Thus, we will not do well in a ranking of grad programs. (I wouldn’t trade my undergrad at Dartmouth for anything, I would probably never do my grad here, unless I wanted to go to tuck).</p>

<p>how does princeton do so well in the world rankings? Arent they mainly focused on undergraduate education too?</p>

<p>Princeton has tons of superb Ph.D. programs in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Not surprising at all that it does so well. A very different situation from Dartmouth, which is truly focused on undergraduate education.</p>

<p>None of the elite liberal arts colleges made the list either, further showing how this list is graduate degree focused.</p>

<p>Well duh…it ranks world universities. I wouldn’t go here for my phd either, but that doesn’t mean I’m not getting an amazing education on the way to my bachelors.</p>

<p>Wait shouldn’t it be the 2011 rankings?? I think these are old.</p>