<p>I put that too.</p>
<p>What about the one about social darwinism? I answered people who wanted the scientific method applied to the social sciences liked social darwinism, or something like that...</p>
<p>I put that too.</p>
<p>What about the one about social darwinism? I answered people who wanted the scientific method applied to the social sciences liked social darwinism, or something like that...</p>
<p>same 10char</p>
<p>its leaders who wanted to control other nations</p>
<p>thats was their justification for imperialism, ie kipling's the white man burden</p>
<p>your probably right ... up to now I've got 5-6 wrong maybe</p>
<p>anybody know what's the right answer to the British Indian policy?</p>
<p>danielcarp i got the same answer for social darwinism
i thought i had the question before from somewhere else so i put that one</p>
<p>what do you mean british india policy</p>
<p>The one with "which led to develop Indian national unity?"</p>
<p>i think it was which DIDNT </p>
<p>i said giving india a national army
because the british didnt do that. they made them a part of their force for ww1, but they didnt give them an army.</p>
<p>ive heard the textile one being said also</p>
<p>Well the textile one makes Indian resent British, in turn causing them also to unite together. So I don't think it's the right answer.</p>
<p>yeah these kind of questions give you two things to think about</p>
<p>1) did it ACTUALLY happen
2) did it have the effect that youre looking for</p>
<p>but im still sticking with the army one</p>
<p>What about the railroad choice? Can that be right?</p>
<p>increase transportation of goods and people, definitely creating unity</p>
<p>hey guyz, what would be the # wrong/ 5 omit for 700+?</p>
<p>social darwinism- was it leaders controlling OWN country or FOREIGN countries?
If it was FOREIGN countries then it's pretty clear that's the answer. If it was OWN country then it was the one about the social scientists.</p>
<p>im pretty sure it was foreign</p>
<p>calculate it
.25 for each wrong</p>
<p>What is the curve though?</p>
<p>got any averages calculated so far? like 20 wrong + 5 omit or something like that?</p>
<p>how much of the population did Mesoamerica lose 1500-1650? I said 75%....</p>
<p>it would be around that for a 700, technically 21, but yeah.</p>