I put no error for Maria, for Colorado visitors seeking outdoor activities, pans labyrinth with the director, the technology incorporating, and octopus
idk if its no error i don’t remember the exact thing its supposed to read had… would have."
same everything except octopus (i said comparable with instead of comparable to). what do you usually get in writing tho?
I usually do well but 5 no errors seems weird
do you get above 700?
And did anyone get detest, dispense for vocab
^that is correct
Got 5 No Errors.
Once common, telephones incorporating or that incorporated
^correct
Was incorporating the error?
im still under the impression that it is comparable with instead of comparable to for the octopus question, but whatever the rest seems to match up with everyone else’s answers so 1-2 mistakes isnt bad for me. good night everyone. we all did great, im sure of it.
incorporating was the error imo
Why?
Why is there no error with “incorporating”?
Telephones incorporating vs telephones that incorporated
No the answer to the question about the Japanese writer about laughing was that she “was not fluent in Japanese” or something
Did anyone else get that the author was “not fluent” as the answer for the Japanese passage question about what the “laughing” indicated?
so what’s the consensus on the telephones incorporating question and why? (if someone remembers the question well, i can shoot it past my teacher)
What was the answer to the Japanese writer question about what the “laughing” indicated?