<p>out of state (texas)
asian (indian)</p>
<p>gpa: 3.6</p>
<p>rank: top 10 percent (i think around 90/900)</p>
<p>mostly B's in 9th and 10th
one C in 10th
All A's in 11th</p>
<p>SAT: 2100</p>
<p>any chance?</p>
<p>out of state (texas)
asian (indian)</p>
<p>gpa: 3.6</p>
<p>rank: top 10 percent (i think around 90/900)</p>
<p>mostly B's in 9th and 10th
one C in 10th
All A's in 11th</p>
<p>SAT: 2100</p>
<p>any chance?</p>
<p>I’ll say mid-reach…you have an upward trend which Mich loves as well as a pretty good SAT. If you list ECs I may be able to judge better, but regardless of upward trend your GPA and OOS status means it’ll probably be a reach. Don’t give up though, you can definitely get in!</p>
<p>how tough is OOS then, people on this board make it seem impossible if you don’t have a 4.0 and 2200?</p>
<p>purely based on scores, yes you have a chance. </p>
<p>But what we say about chances is useless because we are not admission officers.</p>
<p>Supposedly the in-state student stats are the same as the OOS student stats, so you should have an equal opportunity to get admitted.</p>
<p>“Supposedly the in-state student stats are the same as the OOS student stats, so you should have an equal opportunity to get admitted.”</p>
<p>EXPLAIN YOURSELF</p>
<p>Post #77
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-michigan-ann-arbor/947894-tuition-rate-going-up-6.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-michigan-ann-arbor/947894-tuition-rate-going-up-6.html</a></p>
<p>[Out-of-staters</a> get better grades | The Michigan Daily](<a href=“http://www.michigandaily.com/content/out-staters-get-better-grades]Out-of-staters”>Out-of-staters get better grades)
</p>
<p>That’s pretty fascinating actually, especially considering what seems to be the trend among people on CC. But this could definitely be a reasonable argument.</p>
<p>^^
I know I was surprised when I read it.</p>
<p>That post inspired me to look up some stuff.</p>
<p>from [University</a> of Michigan](<a href=“http://www.gradeinflation.com/Michigan.html]University”>University of Michigan)</p>
<p>Average GPA of all undergrads at UMich is 3.27. If you take out engineering undergrads with their 2.8 average and Ross kids and their 3.6 average.</p>
<p>((16223+5459+1082)<em>3.27-5459</em>2.8-1082*3.6)/16223</p>
<p>LSA has an average GPA of ~3.41. That’s, uh, high. Do the other undergraduate schools that I didn’t count (Kines, Nursing, Art/Music) all have terribly low average GPAs?</p>
<p>Okay, my point here was taken the wrong way. I thought you were implying that the same percentage of OOS and IS applicants are accepted, which is not right at all since everyone knows OOS kids have a much more difficult time getting in.</p>
<p>Btw, your findings are still very interesting.</p>
<p>Pro28, first of all, where does the source obtain data from? Secondly, the engineering average GPA is 2.9.</p>
<p>The source lists their source as the Office of the Registrar. I assume they FOIA’d the office for the average GPA. Also, I believe while the average GPA for first year engineering students is a 2.9, the average for all students is 2.8…</p>
<p>^I had heard the other way around. 2.8 for first year, 2.9 overall, but whatever.</p>
<p>lsa can’t have an average of a 3.4. That would mean the average in classes would be more than B+ and that certainly does not happen. Most classes are curved to a B/B-</p>
<p>School of Music average undergraduate GPA is 3.4 – at least, according to the dean per correspondence received.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I know that lower level math/sciences are curved to a B-. But how about lower level humanities or upper level classes with smaller audiences? Psych 111 can’t be curved to a B-, and I sort of doubt any 400-level LSA courses are also curved to a B-. An increase from 3.3 to 3.4 isn’t that high anyway…</p>
<p>PS, OP, your academics are probably okay for Michigan. It’s gonna depend on extracurriculars/essays at this point.</p>
<p>There needs to be a list of what all these curved classes are. I have yet to take a single curved class, ever.</p>
<p>^impossible? You’ve never taken intro calc, chem, etc?</p>
<p>No? I did take my first two years, which amounted to about half my gen eds and my electives, at a different school but I am still taking a variety of LSA classes in different departments and at all different levels and still haven’t encountered any curved courses. I hear people going on all the time about how LSA classes are so easy because the curves are so generous and I don’t understand. o.O</p>