<p>I've finally whittled down my list (I think) to the final set of colleges I'm going to apply to. (dartmouth, harvard, earlham, kalamazoo, oberlin, case western, grinnell, kenyon, st. olaf, macalester, Uchicago)
anywho,
my GPA is 4.06 weighted, around 3.75 unweighted (self-calculated).
Taking/have taken mostly AP/IB classes (chem II, bio II, Calc BC, Eng 12, Psych, etc.)
Only took SATs once: 790 CR, 760 Math, 670 Writing =2220
Subjects: Literature: 740, Biology: 790
AP: Bio 5
EC: Decent, nothing spectactular</p>
<p>So, I'm getting ready to apply to all these colleges, but my plan was to take the Math II subject test in the near future and send the results to it as well. The issue is if I send the others now, and Math II later, its gonna be over $100 extra (because I'll have to send from Collegeboard twice). Do you think I need to/should take the Math II test? Will it help me much? At most colleges require 2 subject tests, are my Lit and Bio scores strong enough?</p>
<p>Any input is appreciated; thought I was good to go n kinda freakin out about this now.</p>
<p>Well, Im not going into engineering. Probably biology or business, but follow pre-med program. I do think I can do well on the math II tho (close to 800), but im wondering is any score really that different from a 740 on the lit test? From what I’ve heard, its generally regarded as substantially harder than the math II and people generally receive lower scores. Is this correct? Do colleges look at math more tho? Anybody?</p>
<p>Pre-Med requires at least some calculation-intensive science classes. It would be to your benefit to show that you have the advanced math skills to handle such work successfully. A good score in literature isn’t going to be as useful in evaluating a potential pre-med major.</p>
<p>Thanks for the input. I’d really started taking a liking to the thought of not having to study for another SAT, but it’s looking like I should. Any other opinions?</p>